Embryos With “No Result” After PGT‐A: A Retrospective Analysis of Causative Factors

<b>Background:</b> "No result" after PGT-A is a rare observation. Factors suspected to cause inconclusive diagnoses include poor embryo quality, day of biopsy, biopsy technique, and technical amplification failure due to diluted DNA material. This study aimed to highlight the predisposing factors that could lead to a "no result" observation after PGT-A. <b>Results:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study involving 177 patients and 1335 blastocysts, 1242 of which comprised the control (result) group and 93 comprised the study (no result) group. The predisposing factors studied were the number of blastocysts available for biopsy, the day of biopsy, the grade of the embryo, the degree of expansion of the blastocyst, and the grade of the trophectoderm on biopsy day. The rate of "no result" embryos did not depend on the degree of expansion of the embryo, the trophectoderm quality, the day of biopsy, or embryo grade (<i>p</i>=0.139, 0.34, 0.332, and 0.272, respectively). Regression analysis showed that the studied embryo characteristics were not significant predisposing factors. However, having more blastocysts to biopsy per patient was found to be a significant predictor of "no result" embryos. <b>Conclusion:</b> No clear embryo-related risk factors could be elucidated; however, the biopsy procedure and sample cellularity seem to be crucial components. In addition, having more embryos per patient to biopsy at a given time might increase the risk of having inconclusive biopsy results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ogi/4043963
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embryos With “No Result” After PGT‐A: A Retrospective Analysis of Causative Factors

Mokhamad Zhaffal, Aparna Bajpai, Elias M. Dahdouh, Anastasia Salame et al.
3 citations
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
10.48
article

Embryos With “No Result” After PGT‐A: A Retrospective Analysis of Causative Factors

Mokhamad Zhaffal, Aparna Bajpai, Elias M. Dahdouh, Anastasia Salame, Rania Aljafari, Shabin Kainoth, Michael Fakih, Arya Muraleekrishnan, Leyla Depret Bixio
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> "No result" after PGT-A is a rare observation. Factors suspected to cause inconclusive diagnoses include poor embryo quality, day of biopsy, biopsy technique, and technical amplification failure due to diluted DNA material. This study aimed to highlight the predisposing factors that could lead to a "no result" observation after PGT-A. <b>Results:</b> This is a retrospective cohort study involving 177 patients and 1335 blastocysts, 1242 of which comprised the control (result) group and 93 comprised the study (no result) group. The predisposing factors studied were the number of blastocysts available for biopsy, the day of biopsy, the grade of the embryo, the degree of expansion of the blastocyst, and the grade of the trophectoderm on biopsy day. The rate of "no result" embryos did not depend on the degree of expansion of the embryo, the trophectoderm quality, the day of biopsy, or embryo grade (<i>p</i>=0.139, 0.34, 0.332, and 0.272, respectively). Regression analysis showed that the studied embryo characteristics were not significant predisposing factors. However, having more blastocysts to biopsy per patient was found to be a significant predictor of "no result" embryos. <b>Conclusion:</b> No clear embryo-related risk factors could be elucidated; however, the biopsy procedure and sample cellularity seem to be crucial components. In addition, having more embryos per patient to biopsy at a given time might increase the risk of having inconclusive biopsy results.

Obstetrics and Gynecology InternationalVol. 2025(1)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA), Al Ain Hospital (AE), Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center (IR), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
10.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.