Governance for Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) Exchange Across the DYNAMO Resilience Cycle

Cyber threats continue to escalate in complexity and frequency, underlining the need for effective Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) exchange to secure critical infrastructures across various sectors. However, the sharing of CTI is often impeded by concerns relating to security, trust, compliance, and coordination among stakeholders. Existing frameworks such as NIST’s Risk Management Framework (RMF) and ENISA’s CTI Maturity Model provide foundational guidance. Still, they are inadequate in fully addressing the sector-specific challenges realised by industries such as healthcare, energy, and maritime. This paper explores the need for a governance framework for CTI exchange by analysing existing literature, frameworks and use cases from critical sectors. The objective is to identify areas where governance is essential for ensuring secure, efficient, and compliant CTI exchange, with a particular focus on sector-specific challenges. The DYNAMO project, a European Union initiative, serves as a key case study for demonstrating how governance principles can be integrated into practical CTI exchange systems. The governance needs for CTI exchange are examined across six phases of the resilience cycle i.e. Prepare, Prevent, Protect, Respond, Recover, and Learn & Adapt. This analysis highlights how a structured governance framework can enhance the effectiveness, security, and compliance of CTI exchange in critical infrastructure sectors. By aligning governance principles with each phase of the resilience cycle, the paper demonstrates how sector-specific challenges can be addressed through improved coordination, regulatory adherence, and continuous learning. The paper concludes that while existing frameworks provide a solid foundation, sector-specific governance models are needed to address the unique risks and regulatory requirements of critical infrastructures. As DYNAMO’s tools are piloted in healthcare, energy, and maritime sectors, future research will focus on validating the proposed governance model through real-world applications, ensuring that it is adaptable to evolving cyber threats and sectoral needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34190/iccws.20.1.3208
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance for Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) Exchange Across the DYNAMO Resilience Cycle

Jyri Rajamäki, Anup Nepal
International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
article

Governance for Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) Exchange Across the DYNAMO Resilience Cycle

Jyri Rajamäki, Anup Nepal
article en

Abstract

Cyber threats continue to escalate in complexity and frequency, underlining the need for effective Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) exchange to secure critical infrastructures across various sectors. However, the sharing of CTI is often impeded by concerns relating to security, trust, compliance, and coordination among stakeholders. Existing frameworks such as NIST’s Risk Management Framework (RMF) and ENISA’s CTI Maturity Model provide foundational guidance. Still, they are inadequate in fully addressing the sector-specific challenges realised by industries such as healthcare, energy, and maritime. This paper explores the need for a governance framework for CTI exchange by analysing existing literature, frameworks and use cases from critical sectors. The objective is to identify areas where governance is essential for ensuring secure, efficient, and compliant CTI exchange, with a particular focus on sector-specific challenges. The DYNAMO project, a European Union initiative, serves as a key case study for demonstrating how governance principles can be integrated into practical CTI exchange systems. The governance needs for CTI exchange are examined across six phases of the resilience cycle i.e. Prepare, Prevent, Protect, Respond, Recover, and Learn & Adapt. This analysis highlights how a structured governance framework can enhance the effectiveness, security, and compliance of CTI exchange in critical infrastructure sectors. By aligning governance principles with each phase of the resilience cycle, the paper demonstrates how sector-specific challenges can be addressed through improved coordination, regulatory adherence, and continuous learning. The paper concludes that while existing frameworks provide a solid foundation, sector-specific governance models are needed to address the unique risks and regulatory requirements of critical infrastructures. As DYNAMO’s tools are piloted in healthcare, energy, and maritime sectors, future research will focus on validating the proposed governance model through real-world applications, ensuring that it is adaptable to evolving cyber threats and sectoral needs.

International Conference on Cyber Warfare and SecurityVol. 20(1)
Laurea University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.