A mixed methods analysis of predictors of a toxic culture among nurses

Objective: The three-year Workforce Engagement for Compassionate Advocacy, Resiliency, and Empowerment (WE CARE) project targets well-being and resilience of post-pandemic nurses in a hospital environment as part of a 2020 grant-funded collaborative agreement with the Health Resources and Services Administration. This project aims to examine extrinsic factors associated with the perception of a toxic work environment among post-pandemic nursing personnel and further describe the toxicity present at work.Methods: A mixed methods design was conducted at an academic medical center in the Southeastern United States to assess nursing well-being. An open-ended question to explore nurses’ perceptions of toxic work environment was added to an annual email survey on well-being topics. All nursing personnel were solicited and 1,359 responded. Results: A total of 366 individuals (27%) selected toxic work environment as a stressor and 50 respondents commented contributing 218 instances of themes. Lack of leadership was the most frequent theme identified (63/218, 28.9%) but others included, in descending order, relational aggression, negative attitudes, lack of job accountability, gossip, favoritism, lack of teamwork, attitudes/bullying, negative work environment, cliques, and lack of trust. The respondents who perceived a toxic culture also reported significantly lower perceived organizational support (M = 7.22) than who did not (M = 9.21) (p < .001, Cohen’s D = 0.64); and other significantly worse outcomes including burnout (60.9% versus 33.5%, Cramer’s V = 0.22), and moral distress (34.4% versus 16.8%, Cramer’s V = 0.17).Conclusions: Although this was a single site study and cannot be generalized, the findings of 27% of nursing personnel experiencing a toxic work environment is notable. Perceived lack of leadership was the most prominent theme. Those reporting a toxic culture also reported lower indicators of well-being. This project should provide an impetus for others to investigate this phenomenon among their respective workforces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v15n5p31
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mixed methods analysis of predictors of a toxic culture among nurses

Patricia A. Patrician, Asiah Ruffin, Aoyjai P. Montgomery, Shannon Sapp Layton et al.
2 citations
Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
article

A mixed methods analysis of predictors of a toxic culture among nurses

Patricia A. Patrician, Asiah Ruffin, Aoyjai P. Montgomery, Shannon Sapp Layton, Laura Woodward, Joseph R. Travis, Tracey Dick, Toni Beam, Teena M. McGuinness, Shea Polancich, Jill Stewart, Katherine A. Meese, Cindy Blackburn
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective: The three-year Workforce Engagement for Compassionate Advocacy, Resiliency, and Empowerment (WE CARE) project targets well-being and resilience of post-pandemic nurses in a hospital environment as part of a 2020 grant-funded collaborative agreement with the Health Resources and Services Administration. This project aims to examine extrinsic factors associated with the perception of a toxic work environment among post-pandemic nursing personnel and further describe the toxicity present at work.Methods: A mixed methods design was conducted at an academic medical center in the Southeastern United States to assess nursing well-being. An open-ended question to explore nurses’ perceptions of toxic work environment was added to an annual email survey on well-being topics. All nursing personnel were solicited and 1,359 responded. Results: A total of 366 individuals (27%) selected toxic work environment as a stressor and 50 respondents commented contributing 218 instances of themes. Lack of leadership was the most frequent theme identified (63/218, 28.9%) but others included, in descending order, relational aggression, negative attitudes, lack of job accountability, gossip, favoritism, lack of teamwork, attitudes/bullying, negative work environment, cliques, and lack of trust. The respondents who perceived a toxic culture also reported significantly lower perceived organizational support (M = 7.22) than who did not (M = 9.21) (p < .001, Cohen’s D = 0.64); and other significantly worse outcomes including burnout (60.9% versus 33.5%, Cramer’s V = 0.22), and moral distress (34.4% versus 16.8%, Cramer’s V = 0.17).Conclusions: Although this was a single site study and cannot be generalized, the findings of 27% of nursing personnel experiencing a toxic work environment is notable. Perceived lack of leadership was the most prominent theme. Those reporting a toxic culture also reported lower indicators of well-being. This project should provide an impetus for others to investigate this phenomenon among their respective workforces.

Journal of Nursing Education and PracticeVol. 15(5)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.