The ‘Spiritual’ and the ‘Religious’ in the Twittersphere: A Topic Model and Semantic Map

Abstract One of the principal challenges of religious studies is the lack of a widely accepted normative definition of the terms ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality.’ Responding to recent calls for methodological innovation in this field, in this paper we present a “bottom-up” approach to outlining these concepts based on an interdisciplinary, usage-based approach, which combines qualitative analysis with methods of distributional semantics. Based on the Firthian principle that a word may be known “by the company it keeps,” we used a convenience sample of 138,000 Tweets gathered between March and April 2021 to calculate seven clusters of terms related to ‘spirituality’ and ‘religion.’ Three authors then coded these clusters to propose a tentative name for each. An unsupervised sentiment analysis was conducted and presented on a concept map. We suggest that the Twitter (now ‘X’) data at hand echoes the popular perception of ‘spirituality’ as a positively connoted term, which contrasts with a negatively connoted ‘religion.’ However, the data may be interpreted to arrive at more nuanced and, at times, contradictory interpretations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture
Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/21659214-bja10123
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘Spiritual’ and the ‘Religious’ in the Twittersphere: A Topic Model and Semantic Map

Simon Peng‐Keller, Gerold Schneider, Janis Goldzycher, Fabian Winiger et al.
1 citations
Journal of Religion Media and Digital Culture
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
17.27
article

The ‘Spiritual’ and the ‘Religious’ in the Twittersphere: A Topic Model and Semantic Map

Simon Peng‐Keller, Gerold Schneider, Janis Goldzycher, Fabian Winiger, David Neuhold
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract One of the principal challenges of religious studies is the lack of a widely accepted normative definition of the terms ‘religion’ and ‘spirituality.’ Responding to recent calls for methodological innovation in this field, in this paper we present a “bottom-up” approach to outlining these concepts based on an interdisciplinary, usage-based approach, which combines qualitative analysis with methods of distributional semantics. Based on the Firthian principle that a word may be known “by the company it keeps,” we used a convenience sample of 138,000 Tweets gathered between March and April 2021 to calculate seven clusters of terms related to ‘spirituality’ and ‘religion.’ Three authors then coded these clusters to propose a tentative name for each. An unsupervised sentiment analysis was conducted and presented on a concept map. We suggest that the Twitter (now ‘X’) data at hand echoes the popular perception of ‘spirituality’ as a positively connoted term, which contrasts with a negatively connoted ‘religion.’ However, the data may be interpreted to arrive at more nuanced and, at times, contradictory interpretations.

Journal of Religion Media and Digital CultureVol. 14(1)
University of Lucerne (CH), University of Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.