Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients With Refractory Prurigo Nodularis: A 16‐Week, Single‐Center, Prospective, Observational Pilot Study

Background: The current management for prurigo nodularis (PN) is challenging. Tofacitinib may emerge as a promising treatment for PN. Aim: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in treating refractory PN. Design and methods: A 16‐week prospective observational pilot study was conducted in patients with moderate‐to‐severe refractory PN. The enrolled patients received oral tofacitinib. The primary endpoints included improvement in pruritus and quality of life, as measured by investigator’s global assessment (IGA), prurigo activity score (PAS), visual analog scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS), verbal rating scale (VRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Itchy Specific Quality of Life (Itchy QoL) at week 12. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a ≥ 4‐point reduction in Worst Itch‐Numeric Rating Scale (WI‐NRS) from baseline at week 12 and week 16. Safety assessments were conducted through week 16. Besides, historical controls, mixed‐effects model (MMRM), and post‐hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib. Results: Twenty‐four PN patients included demonstrated clinical improvement in terms of skin lesions, pruritus, and quality of life. IGA, PAS items, VAS, NRS, VRS, DLQI, and Itchy QoL significantly improved from the baseline to 12 weeks of tofacitinib treatment ( p < 0.05 for all). However, the response to tofacitinib became less pronounced at week 16, with reduced improvement in skin lesions, itch, and quality of life compared to that at week 12. The percentage of patients experiencing a ≥ 4‐point WI‐NRS reduction decreased from 75% at week 12% to 66.67% at week 16. The results of historical controls, MMRM model, and post hoc analyses supported the clinical efficacy of tofacitinib in PN, with baseline NRS 24h,worst appearing to be a potentially clinical feature impacting treatment efficacy. No severe adverse events were reported up until the end of the study period. Conclusions: Tofacitinib demonstrates effectiveness in reducing itch and skin infiltration in patients with moderate‐to‐severe PN, whereas its long‐term efficacy requires further observation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06201715

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatologic Therapy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/dth/8988947
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients With Refractory Prurigo Nodularis: A 16‐Week, Single‐Center, Prospective, Observational Pilot Study

Ru Dai, Xiao‐Yong Man, Chao-Cheng Chi, I‐Jung Hsieh et al.
1 citations
Dermatologic Therapy
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
2.00
article

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Patients With Refractory Prurigo Nodularis: A 16‐Week, Single‐Center, Prospective, Observational Pilot Study

Ru Dai, Xiao‐Yong Man, Chao-Cheng Chi, I‐Jung Hsieh, Yuchen Lou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The current management for prurigo nodularis (PN) is challenging. Tofacitinib may emerge as a promising treatment for PN. Aim: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in treating refractory PN. Design and methods: A 16‐week prospective observational pilot study was conducted in patients with moderate‐to‐severe refractory PN. The enrolled patients received oral tofacitinib. The primary endpoints included improvement in pruritus and quality of life, as measured by investigator’s global assessment (IGA), prurigo activity score (PAS), visual analog scale (VAS), numeric rating scale (NRS), verbal rating scale (VRS), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Itchy Specific Quality of Life (Itchy QoL) at week 12. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with a ≥ 4‐point reduction in Worst Itch‐Numeric Rating Scale (WI‐NRS) from baseline at week 12 and week 16. Safety assessments were conducted through week 16. Besides, historical controls, mixed‐effects model (MMRM), and post‐hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the efficacy of tofacitinib. Results: Twenty‐four PN patients included demonstrated clinical improvement in terms of skin lesions, pruritus, and quality of life. IGA, PAS items, VAS, NRS, VRS, DLQI, and Itchy QoL significantly improved from the baseline to 12 weeks of tofacitinib treatment ( p < 0.05 for all). However, the response to tofacitinib became less pronounced at week 16, with reduced improvement in skin lesions, itch, and quality of life compared to that at week 12. The percentage of patients experiencing a ≥ 4‐point WI‐NRS reduction decreased from 75% at week 12% to 66.67% at week 16. The results of historical controls, MMRM model, and post hoc analyses supported the clinical efficacy of tofacitinib in PN, with baseline NRS 24h,worst appearing to be a potentially clinical feature impacting treatment efficacy. No severe adverse events were reported up until the end of the study period. Conclusions: Tofacitinib demonstrates effectiveness in reducing itch and skin infiltration in patients with moderate‐to‐severe PN, whereas its long‐term efficacy requires further observation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06201715

Dermatologic TherapyVol. 2025(1)
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Dermatology and Skin Diseases
2.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.