Upholding “Parliamentary Supremacy”

Abstract This study analyzes the fiscal reform bills introduced by Iranian Minister of Finance, Mohammad Mosaddeq, under the first Ahmad Qavām cabinet (1921–1922) during the late Qajar era, focusing on legal arguments in the National Assembly and their political background. An analysis of parliamentary and other contemporary sources reveals the contradiction between Mosaddeq and parliamentary deputies; the former pushed for expeditious and drastic reforms by delegating some parts of their legislative processes to the government, while the latter prioritized consensus-building in the National Assembly through careful deliberation. These contradictions gradually created an irreparable rift between them, although both roughly shared the necessity and direction of the fiscal reforms. This accelerated the collapse of the Qavām cabinet and the emergence of Rezā Khān’s dictatorial reign (Prime Minister 1923–1925; later Rezā Shāh Pahlavi 1925–1941) amid parliamentary turmoil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Parliamentary Studies
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26668912-bja10100
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upholding “Parliamentary Supremacy”

Yoshiaki Tokunaga
International Journal of Parliamentary Studies
Political Systems and Governance
article

Upholding “Parliamentary Supremacy”

Yoshiaki Tokunaga
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study analyzes the fiscal reform bills introduced by Iranian Minister of Finance, Mohammad Mosaddeq, under the first Ahmad Qavām cabinet (1921–1922) during the late Qajar era, focusing on legal arguments in the National Assembly and their political background. An analysis of parliamentary and other contemporary sources reveals the contradiction between Mosaddeq and parliamentary deputies; the former pushed for expeditious and drastic reforms by delegating some parts of their legislative processes to the government, while the latter prioritized consensus-building in the National Assembly through careful deliberation. These contradictions gradually created an irreparable rift between them, although both roughly shared the necessity and direction of the fiscal reforms. This accelerated the collapse of the Qavām cabinet and the emergence of Rezā Khān’s dictatorial reign (Prime Minister 1923–1925; later Rezā Shāh Pahlavi 1925–1941) amid parliamentary turmoil.

International Journal of Parliamentary StudiesVol. 5(1)
Nihon University (JP), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Upholding “Parliamentary Supremacy” — Yoshiaki Tokunaga · International Journal of Parliamentary Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS