Oil price shocks, policy uncertainty, and China’s carbon emissions trading market price

As a market mechanism to address climate change, carbon allowance has been endowed with financial asset property. As a result, the carbon emissions trading market prices (CP) are likely to be affected by oil prices and policy uncertainty. Therefore, this study employs a quantile regression model to examine the nonlinear effects of oil price shocks and policy uncertainty on the CP. Empirical results show that although both oil price and policy uncertainty positively influence the CP in all quantiles, there is a nonlinear effect of oil prices on CP, with larger coefficients observed in the high quantiles compared to those in the medium and low quantiles. Furthermore, the impact of structural oil price shocks on the CP is heterogeneous in that supply and demand shocks negatively affect the CP. In contrast, risk shocks affect the CP positively in all quantiles. In addition, policy uncertainty positively influences the CP. This influence is heterogeneous and varies across different categories of policy uncertainty. Specifically, in the low quantiles, monetary policy uncertainty positively affects the CP while exchange rate and trade policy uncertainty negatively affect the CP. Meanwhile, in the medium and high quantiles, climate policy uncertainty positively affects the CP. The findings suggest that policymakers should adopt stabilization policies to reduce the occurrence of drastic fluctuations in China’s CP to fulfill the target of cheaper emission reduction via market systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04724-z
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oil price shocks, policy uncertainty, and China’s carbon emissions trading market price

Wenmei Yu, Qin Hong, Qiang Cao
3 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
article

Oil price shocks, policy uncertainty, and China’s carbon emissions trading market price

Wenmei Yu, Qin Hong, Qiang Cao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

As a market mechanism to address climate change, carbon allowance has been endowed with financial asset property. As a result, the carbon emissions trading market prices (CP) are likely to be affected by oil prices and policy uncertainty. Therefore, this study employs a quantile regression model to examine the nonlinear effects of oil price shocks and policy uncertainty on the CP. Empirical results show that although both oil price and policy uncertainty positively influence the CP in all quantiles, there is a nonlinear effect of oil prices on CP, with larger coefficients observed in the high quantiles compared to those in the medium and low quantiles. Furthermore, the impact of structural oil price shocks on the CP is heterogeneous in that supply and demand shocks negatively affect the CP. In contrast, risk shocks affect the CP positively in all quantiles. In addition, policy uncertainty positively influences the CP. This influence is heterogeneous and varies across different categories of policy uncertainty. Specifically, in the low quantiles, monetary policy uncertainty positively affects the CP while exchange rate and trade policy uncertainty negatively affect the CP. Meanwhile, in the medium and high quantiles, climate policy uncertainty positively affects the CP. The findings suggest that policymakers should adopt stabilization policies to reduce the occurrence of drastic fluctuations in China’s CP to fulfill the target of cheaper emission reduction via market systems.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Anhui University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.