Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: free light chain testing as a possible valuable marker in cerebrospinal fluid

Background: the aim of the study was to assess the importance of free light-chain analysis in the Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients visited at the General Hospital of Alessandria. Materials and Methods: detecting κFLC and λFLC levels in CSF and serum using Freelite tests on Optilite analyser (The Binding Site) and Isoelectric Focusing (IEF) on Hydrasis 2 analyser (Sebia). Statistical analysis was conducted by GraphPad statistical software and Excel statistical tools. Calculation of p-value by Kruskal-Wallis test and χ2 test. Evaluation of the Free Light Chain (FLC) indices’ performance through the construction of a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve. Results: 132 CSF and serum samples were collected, and 25% of the patients were diagnosed with MS. Through the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value was found to be 6,56 for the K index, 10,12 for the λ index, and 0,65 for the IgG index. FLC indices were higher in MS patients than in others. Conclusions: the study shows that the K index has an equivalent reliability and a higher predictive value, but with lower costs and times than Oligoclonal Bands (OCB). The λ index could have the potential to become a further test used for differential diagnosis of MS, but more in-depth studies via more sensitive techniques are needed to evaluate real performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Working Paper of Public Health
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/wpph.2025.9947
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: free light chain testing as a possible valuable marker in cerebrospinal fluid

Elia Ranzato, Antonio Covelli, Lara Calcagno, Simona Martinotti et al.
Working Paper of Public Health
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Multiple sclerosis diagnosis: free light chain testing as a possible valuable marker in cerebrospinal fluid

Elia Ranzato, Antonio Covelli, Lara Calcagno, Simona Martinotti, Fabiana Vercellino, Cristina Montarolo, Filippo Erli, Iacopo Megna
article en

Abstract

Background: the aim of the study was to assess the importance of free light-chain analysis in the Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in patients visited at the General Hospital of Alessandria. Materials and Methods: detecting κFLC and λFLC levels in CSF and serum using Freelite tests on Optilite analyser (The Binding Site) and Isoelectric Focusing (IEF) on Hydrasis 2 analyser (Sebia). Statistical analysis was conducted by GraphPad statistical software and Excel statistical tools. Calculation of p-value by Kruskal-Wallis test and χ2 test. Evaluation of the Free Light Chain (FLC) indices’ performance through the construction of a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve. Results: 132 CSF and serum samples were collected, and 25% of the patients were diagnosed with MS. Through the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value was found to be 6,56 for the K index, 10,12 for the λ index, and 0,65 for the IgG index. FLC indices were higher in MS patients than in others. Conclusions: the study shows that the K index has an equivalent reliability and a higher predictive value, but with lower costs and times than Oligoclonal Bands (OCB). The λ index could have the potential to become a further test used for differential diagnosis of MS, but more in-depth studies via more sensitive techniques are needed to evaluate real performance.

Working Paper of Public HealthVol. 13
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo (IT), American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (US), Thermo Fisher Scientific (Israel) (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.