Does Equal Income Maximize Social Welfare When Multiple Pure Public Goods Are Privately Provided?

ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the relationship between income distribution and social welfare when multiple pure public goods are privately provided. With a single public good and identical preferences, an increase in income inequality raises social welfare when it reduces the set of contributors so equality cannot be social optimal. We explore how this result is modified when there are multiple privately‐provided public goods. It is shown that regions of neutrality alternate with regions of non‐neutrality as income distribution is varied. In particular, in the setting of multiple privately‐supplied public goods with non‐idential preferences a region of non‐neutrality emerges when individuals contribute to different public goods or when only one individual contributes. Moreover, social welfare will always be maximized by an income distribution located in a region of non‐neutrality. This result implies that social welfare has local maxima at income distributions with inequality as well as around the equal income distribution. We also explore how the optimal extent of inequality is dependent on preference parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economic Theory
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70016
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Equal Income Maximize Social Welfare When Multiple Pure Public Goods Are Privately Provided?

Jun‐ichi Itaya, Gareth D. Myles, Atsue Mizushima
Journal of Public Economic Theory
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
article

Does Equal Income Maximize Social Welfare When Multiple Pure Public Goods Are Privately Provided?

Jun‐ichi Itaya, Gareth D. Myles, Atsue Mizushima
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper analyzes the relationship between income distribution and social welfare when multiple pure public goods are privately provided. With a single public good and identical preferences, an increase in income inequality raises social welfare when it reduces the set of contributors so equality cannot be social optimal. We explore how this result is modified when there are multiple privately‐provided public goods. It is shown that regions of neutrality alternate with regions of non‐neutrality as income distribution is varied. In particular, in the setting of multiple privately‐supplied public goods with non‐idential preferences a region of non‐neutrality emerges when individuals contribute to different public goods or when only one individual contributes. Moreover, social welfare will always be maximized by an income distribution located in a region of non‐neutrality. This result implies that social welfare has local maxima at income distributions with inequality as well as around the equal income distribution. We also explore how the optimal extent of inequality is dependent on preference parameters.

Journal of Public Economic TheoryVol. 27(2)
Osaka University of Economics (JP), Hokusei Gakuen University (JP), Dartmouth Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.