AI-driven Treatment Planning for Mental Health Practitioners
This research investigates the effectiveness of AI-driven treatment planning tools in enhancing the decision-making capabilities of mental health practitioners, addressing the critical challenge of integrating artificial intelligence into clinical settings to improve treatment outcomes. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study gathers quantitative and qualitative data from mental health professionals concerning their experiences with AI-associated planning systems, treatment efficacy measures, and user feedback. The findings reveal that while mental health practitioners acknowledge the utility of AI tools in streamlining treatment planning and enhancing diagnostic accuracy, there are significant concerns regarding the reliance on technology and the varying levels of proficiency among practitioners. This study highlights the need for comprehensive training and support systems to optimize the integration of AI in clinical practice, underscoring its potential to enhance therapeutic outcomes and facilitate personalized treatment plans. The significance of these findings lies in their capacity to inform the development of best practices for AI implementation in mental health care, ultimately contributing to the improvement of patient outcomes. The broader implications of this research not only advance the dialogue on the intersection of technology and mental health care but also pave the way for future studies aimed at refining AI tools, ensuring their design aligns with practitioners' needs, and reinforcing the human aspect of mental health treatment amidst increasing technological advancement.
Authors
- Sabyasachi Saha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1050-5981)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
- Published
- 2025-03-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.67716
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00