Evaluating the implementation of operational readiness and maintenance policies in US Army aviation

This study examines AH-64 Apache dispatch decisions to assess the implementation of operational readiness (OR) and maintenance policies in the US Army. Current policies are designed to promote a ready and flexible force that is prepared to respond to global force projection requirements. The Army dictates a 75% OR target for aviation equipment and urges units to utilize aircraft uniformly to distribute maintenance capacity and prevent backlog. Given these objectives, we would expect a reduced OR rating to compel fewer sorties and uniformly distributed flying hours over the phase maintenance horizon. However, using a generalized additive model (GAM), findings indicate that diminished OR does not deter flight operations. Moreover, aircraft are more likely to be grounded when approaching scheduled phase maintenance. Further analysis exposes a significant interaction effect; units place greater weight on an aircraft’s hours until phase maintenance in the presence of low OR, highlighting a potential risk aversion in decision-making. Interestingly, control variables (the day of the week and reporting period proximity) highly correlate with flight decisions. The findings suggest that current aviation readiness metrics may have an unintended influence on units’ resource allocation. Future research should investigate unit-specific decision-making frameworks to improve aviation maintenance and OR efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129251328044
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the implementation of operational readiness and maintenance policies in US Army aviation

H. Sebastian Heese, Brandon M. McConnell, Austin D Semmel
The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology
Technology Assessment and Management
article

Evaluating the implementation of operational readiness and maintenance policies in US Army aviation

H. Sebastian Heese, Brandon M. McConnell, Austin D Semmel
article en

Abstract

This study examines AH-64 Apache dispatch decisions to assess the implementation of operational readiness (OR) and maintenance policies in the US Army. Current policies are designed to promote a ready and flexible force that is prepared to respond to global force projection requirements. The Army dictates a 75% OR target for aviation equipment and urges units to utilize aircraft uniformly to distribute maintenance capacity and prevent backlog. Given these objectives, we would expect a reduced OR rating to compel fewer sorties and uniformly distributed flying hours over the phase maintenance horizon. However, using a generalized additive model (GAM), findings indicate that diminished OR does not deter flight operations. Moreover, aircraft are more likely to be grounded when approaching scheduled phase maintenance. Further analysis exposes a significant interaction effect; units place greater weight on an aircraft’s hours until phase maintenance in the presence of low OR, highlighting a potential risk aversion in decision-making. Interestingly, control variables (the day of the week and reporting period proximity) highly correlate with flight decisions. The findings suggest that current aviation readiness metrics may have an unintended influence on units’ resource allocation. Future research should investigate unit-specific decision-making frameworks to improve aviation maintenance and OR efficiency.

The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation Applications Methodology Technology
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Technology Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.