Diabetes Management Through Remote Patient Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Program Enrollment and Attrition

<b>Background:</b> Despite the growing use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) in diabetes management, few studies have assessed program enrollment and attrition. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach to examining factors linked to program enrollment and attrition amongst a large sample of patients who went through RPM in diabetes management. <b>Methods:</b> Based on quantitative data from the Remote Interventions Improving Specialty Complex Care program conducted in Nebraska from 2014 to 2018, chi-squared or <i>t</i> tests were used to compare three groups of patients with diabetes who had been contacted for program participation: those who completed the intervention, withdrew from the intervention, or declined to participate. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with program dropout. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to assess patient feedback based on semi-structured interviews with patients from the three groups. <b>Results:</b> Out of the 1993 patients with diabetes invited for participation, 13% (n = 256) declined to participate, 16% (n = 317) withdrew before completion, and 71% (n = 1420) completed the intervention. Being younger or having poorer health (as indicated by higher blood glucose or blood pressure) at the baseline was associated with higher odds of program withdrawal. The top reason patients cited for declining participation or withdrawal from RPM was not having enough time to complete the intervention. Patients who declined to participate mentioned that an offer of incentives or more information at the beginning of the intervention may increase their motivation for participation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Being younger or having poorer health at the baseline was associated with higher odds of withdrawing from the RPM program. Future RPM programs can increase program retention by becoming more responsive to the health needs of vulnerable patients who struggle with managing their diabetes or related comorbidities at the baseline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13070698
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diabetes Management Through Remote Patient Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Program Enrollment and Attrition

Jennifer A. Andersen, Donglan Zhang, José A. Pagán, Yan Li et al.
1 citations
Healthcare
Diabetes Management and Education
1.29
article

Diabetes Management Through Remote Patient Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Program Enrollment and Attrition

Jennifer A. Andersen, Donglan Zhang, José A. Pagán, Yan Li, Jessica Ern, Dejun Su, Tzeyu L. Michaud, Liwei Chen, Lu Shi, Jian Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Despite the growing use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) in diabetes management, few studies have assessed program enrollment and attrition. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach to examining factors linked to program enrollment and attrition amongst a large sample of patients who went through RPM in diabetes management. <b>Methods:</b> Based on quantitative data from the Remote Interventions Improving Specialty Complex Care program conducted in Nebraska from 2014 to 2018, chi-squared or <i>t</i> tests were used to compare three groups of patients with diabetes who had been contacted for program participation: those who completed the intervention, withdrew from the intervention, or declined to participate. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with program dropout. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to assess patient feedback based on semi-structured interviews with patients from the three groups. <b>Results:</b> Out of the 1993 patients with diabetes invited for participation, 13% (n = 256) declined to participate, 16% (n = 317) withdrew before completion, and 71% (n = 1420) completed the intervention. Being younger or having poorer health (as indicated by higher blood glucose or blood pressure) at the baseline was associated with higher odds of program withdrawal. The top reason patients cited for declining participation or withdrawal from RPM was not having enough time to complete the intervention. Patients who declined to participate mentioned that an offer of incentives or more information at the beginning of the intervention may increase their motivation for participation. <b>Conclusions:</b> Being younger or having poorer health at the baseline was associated with higher odds of withdrawing from the RPM program. Future RPM programs can increase program retention by becoming more responsive to the health needs of vulnerable patients who struggle with managing their diabetes or related comorbidities at the baseline.

HealthcareVol. 13(7)
Pace University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), New York University (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Diabetes Management and Education
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.