Risk Assessment and Monitoring Methods for Geologic Sequestration of CO2 in the Saline Aquifer

Geological sequestration of CO2 is considered to be the most effective measure to realize long-term CO2 emission reduction, which is the key to influence the progress of carbon neutralization. In recent years, CO2 storage in the saline aquifer has been widely utilized in many countries as it is one of the most effective ways of carbon sequestration. This paper first summarizes the geological storage mechanism of CO2 in the saline aquifer as tectonic storage, capillary storage, adsorption storage, dissolution storage and mineral storage, and then considers the criteria for selecting the site of CO2 in the saline aquifer in terms of technology, safety and economy. During the sequestration process, CO2 may leak from wellbores, caprock, and fractures, and to cope with these scenarios, risk assessments are often conducted using the Delphi method, brainstorming method, risk checklist method, SWOT technique, and FEP method, among others. When targeting complex projects, the combined use of these methods can effectively improve the comprehensiveness and accuracy of risk identification, laying the foundation for subsequent risk assessment and the development of countermeasures. In order to ensure that CO2 can be safely stored in the ground for a long time, it is necessary to implement different monitoring methods according to different purposes, which can be generally divided into three categories: CO2 environmental monitoring, CO2 safety monitoring and CO2 transportation monitoring. CO2 environmental monitoring can be divided into the atmosphere, the near-surface and the shallow stratum in terms of vertical spatial stratum distribution. The shallow stratum environmental detection technology is more mature, but due to the meteorological and topographical impact on the accuracy of atmospheric and near-surface environmental monitoring technology, generally using a combination of multi-technology for monitoring. CO2 leakage caused by easy to cause harm, this time the use of CO2 safety monitoring, is divided into surface deformation, stratigraphic deformation, ground stress, wellbore integrity and wellbore corrosion. We also use seismic, logging and geochemical methods to monitor CO2 transportation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/6tkygm56
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Assessment and Monitoring Methods for Geologic Sequestration of CO2 in the Saline Aquifer

Yiping Zhang
1 citations
Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.80
article

Risk Assessment and Monitoring Methods for Geologic Sequestration of CO2 in the Saline Aquifer

Yiping Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Geological sequestration of CO2 is considered to be the most effective measure to realize long-term CO2 emission reduction, which is the key to influence the progress of carbon neutralization. In recent years, CO2 storage in the saline aquifer has been widely utilized in many countries as it is one of the most effective ways of carbon sequestration. This paper first summarizes the geological storage mechanism of CO2 in the saline aquifer as tectonic storage, capillary storage, adsorption storage, dissolution storage and mineral storage, and then considers the criteria for selecting the site of CO2 in the saline aquifer in terms of technology, safety and economy. During the sequestration process, CO2 may leak from wellbores, caprock, and fractures, and to cope with these scenarios, risk assessments are often conducted using the Delphi method, brainstorming method, risk checklist method, SWOT technique, and FEP method, among others. When targeting complex projects, the combined use of these methods can effectively improve the comprehensiveness and accuracy of risk identification, laying the foundation for subsequent risk assessment and the development of countermeasures. In order to ensure that CO2 can be safely stored in the ground for a long time, it is necessary to implement different monitoring methods according to different purposes, which can be generally divided into three categories: CO2 environmental monitoring, CO2 safety monitoring and CO2 transportation monitoring. CO2 environmental monitoring can be divided into the atmosphere, the near-surface and the shallow stratum in terms of vertical spatial stratum distribution. The shallow stratum environmental detection technology is more mature, but due to the meteorological and topographical impact on the accuracy of atmospheric and near-surface environmental monitoring technology, generally using a combination of multi-technology for monitoring. CO2 leakage caused by easy to cause harm, this time the use of CO2 safety monitoring, is divided into surface deformation, stratigraphic deformation, ground stress, wellbore integrity and wellbore corrosion. We also use seismic, logging and geochemical methods to monitor CO2 transportation.

Highlights in Science Engineering and TechnologyVol. 135
Yangtze University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.