Genetic Diversity and Distinctiveness of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Between Landraces and Formal Cultivars Supporting Ex Situ Conservation Policy: The Borlotti Case Study in Northern Italy

The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) arrived in Europe in the sixteenth century from the American continent and spread across the old continent as a result of adaptation to different climatic and geographical conditions, as well as selection for different cultivation techniques and eating habits. This expansion gave rise to a huge number of landraces, which have now been largely replaced by more productive cultivars. To avoid losing this genetic diversity heritage, it is essential to characterize the genetic resources at risk of extinction for correct in situ/ex situ conservation and as a first step toward promoting and relaunching their exploitation. In this article, we report the study of a group of Borlotti beans, both landraces and modern cultivars, which are typically cultivated in Northern Italy. The aim was to explore the variability within the assembled Borlotti panel to assess whether landraces have maintained their morphological and genetic identity over time during on-farm cultivation. In particular, we investigated whether it is possible to distinguish between landraces and commercial accessions, a topic that has so far been understudied, but in the field of conservation, it is particularly important because it allows for the prioritization of preserving genetic resources. We found distinctive traits among the various accessions, with only a few landraces maintaining their identity, many of which should more properly be defined as obsolete cultivars. Taken together, these data indicate that it is possible to establish a priority scale for in/ex situ conservation by comparing landraces and cultivars using morphological and genetic data. Furthermore, thanks to geographical isolation, on-farm conservation has proven to still be successful in maintaining the identity of landraces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2025-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15040786
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic Diversity and Distinctiveness of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Between Landraces and Formal Cultivars Supporting Ex Situ Conservation Policy: The Borlotti Case Study in Northern Italy

T. Sala, Agostino Fricano, Graziano Rossi, Laura Toppino et al.
2 citations
Agronomy
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
3.50
article

Genetic Diversity and Distinctiveness of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Between Landraces and Formal Cultivars Supporting Ex Situ Conservation Policy: The Borlotti Case Study in Northern Italy

T. Sala, Agostino Fricano, Graziano Rossi, Laura Toppino, Michela Landoni, Alessia Losa, Valerio Gipli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) arrived in Europe in the sixteenth century from the American continent and spread across the old continent as a result of adaptation to different climatic and geographical conditions, as well as selection for different cultivation techniques and eating habits. This expansion gave rise to a huge number of landraces, which have now been largely replaced by more productive cultivars. To avoid losing this genetic diversity heritage, it is essential to characterize the genetic resources at risk of extinction for correct in situ/ex situ conservation and as a first step toward promoting and relaunching their exploitation. In this article, we report the study of a group of Borlotti beans, both landraces and modern cultivars, which are typically cultivated in Northern Italy. The aim was to explore the variability within the assembled Borlotti panel to assess whether landraces have maintained their morphological and genetic identity over time during on-farm cultivation. In particular, we investigated whether it is possible to distinguish between landraces and commercial accessions, a topic that has so far been understudied, but in the field of conservation, it is particularly important because it allows for the prioritization of preserving genetic resources. We found distinctive traits among the various accessions, with only a few landraces maintaining their identity, many of which should more properly be defined as obsolete cultivars. Taken together, these data indicate that it is possible to establish a priority scale for in/ex situ conservation by comparing landraces and cultivars using morphological and genetic data. Furthermore, thanks to geographical isolation, on-farm conservation has proven to still be successful in maintaining the identity of landraces.

AgronomyVol. 15(4)
University of Milan (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Cereal Research Centre (IT)
European Commission, Regione Lombardia
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.