Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Bioequivalence of Test Insulin Glargine Versus Reference Preparation (Lantus®) in Healthy Male Volunteers—By Euglycemic Clamp Technique

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of two insulin glargine preparations in healthy Chinese male subjects. <b>Methods:</b> Forty healthy Chinese male subjects were enrolled in this randomized, open, two-sequence, four-period, single-dose, crossover study and were randomly divided into RTRT or TRTR (first-period injection of test preparation, second-period injection of reference preparation, third-period injection of test preparation, fourth-period injection of reference preparation) groups. A 24 h euglycemic clamp test measured GIR. Plasma insulin glargine concentration and C-peptide were collected during the trial and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). WinNonLin calculated PD/PK parameters and the equivalence of the two preparations was testified by SAS9.2. <b>Results:</b> The average concentration of C-peptide was lower than the baseline and the blood glucose was close to the targeted value in each sequence. PK parameters c<sub>max</sub> of the test and the reference preparation insulin glargine were 0.580 and 0.614 ng·mL<sup>-1</sup>, and the AUC<sub>0-24h</sub> were 9.782 and 10.436 h·ng·mL<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. PD parameters GIR<sub>max</sub> were 42.748 and 45.279 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, and AUC<sub>GIR,0-24h</sub> were 2.924 and 3.096 h·mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. There was no clinically significant adverse reaction observed during the experiment. <b>Conclusions:</b> The glucose clamp has been established and bioequivalence between test preparation and reference preparation has been demonstrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutics
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17040418
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Bioequivalence of Test Insulin Glargine Versus Reference Preparation (Lantus®) in Healthy Male Volunteers—By Euglycemic Clamp Technique

Zhongping Li, Chengyong Tang, Lei Wan, Yi Tao et al.
Pharmaceutics
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Bioequivalence of Test Insulin Glargine Versus Reference Preparation (Lantus®) in Healthy Male Volunteers—By Euglycemic Clamp Technique

Zhongping Li, Chengyong Tang, Lei Wan, Yi Tao, Mingxue Zhu, Hongtao Zhao, Yuan Chen, Min Liu
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of two insulin glargine preparations in healthy Chinese male subjects. <b>Methods:</b> Forty healthy Chinese male subjects were enrolled in this randomized, open, two-sequence, four-period, single-dose, crossover study and were randomly divided into RTRT or TRTR (first-period injection of test preparation, second-period injection of reference preparation, third-period injection of test preparation, fourth-period injection of reference preparation) groups. A 24 h euglycemic clamp test measured GIR. Plasma insulin glargine concentration and C-peptide were collected during the trial and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). WinNonLin calculated PD/PK parameters and the equivalence of the two preparations was testified by SAS9.2. <b>Results:</b> The average concentration of C-peptide was lower than the baseline and the blood glucose was close to the targeted value in each sequence. PK parameters c<sub>max</sub> of the test and the reference preparation insulin glargine were 0.580 and 0.614 ng·mL<sup>-1</sup>, and the AUC<sub>0-24h</sub> were 9.782 and 10.436 h·ng·mL<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. PD parameters GIR<sub>max</sub> were 42.748 and 45.279 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, and AUC<sub>GIR,0-24h</sub> were 2.924 and 3.096 h·mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. There was no clinically significant adverse reaction observed during the experiment. <b>Conclusions:</b> The glucose clamp has been established and bioequivalence between test preparation and reference preparation has been demonstrated.

PharmaceuticsVol. 17(4)
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.