34 Cognitive models of reading are also models of the brain: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of reading

Objectives/Goals: Many left hemisphere stroke survivors have a reading disorder (alexia), which is experienced as decreasing well-being. Therapies produce inconsistent results, demonstrating a need for treatment response predictors. We identify neural correlates of a computational model of reading, which may provide biomarkers to improve therapeutic outcomes. Methods/Study Population: Left hemisphere stroke survivors (LHSS) (n = 52) performed an oral reading task and tests of semantic and phonological processing. Artificial neural network (ANN) models, mapping between orthography (visual word form), phonology (auditory word form), and semantics (word meaning), were trained to read single words at an adult reading level. Stroke was simulated by removing percentages (in 10% intervals) of the connections into and out of semantics, phonology, and the combination thereof. The lesioned model producing the smallest average Euclidean distance over word and pseudoword reading accuracy to each LHSS was selected as the matched model. Two voxelwise lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) analyses identified the neural correlates of the percent of phonological and semantic links removed in the matched models. Results/Anticipated Results: Model reading was correlated with LHSS reading (high-frequency regular words, r(48) = 0.96; high-frequency irregular words, r(48) = 0.94; low-frequency regular words, r(48) = 0.97); low-frequency irregular words, r(48) = 0.85; all p’s Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our results show that ANN models of reading, when closely matched to LHSS reading performance, directly connect cognitive processes to the brain. Using matched models as a precision medicine framework to predict therapy response or to identify targets for neurostimulation provides a valuable route toward improving poststroke language outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.723
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

34 Cognitive models of reading are also models of the brain: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of reading

Andrew T. DeMarco, Peter E. Turkeltaub, Ryan Staples
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

34 Cognitive models of reading are also models of the brain: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of reading

Andrew T. DeMarco, Peter E. Turkeltaub, Ryan Staples
article en

Abstract

Objectives/Goals: Many left hemisphere stroke survivors have a reading disorder (alexia), which is experienced as decreasing well-being. Therapies produce inconsistent results, demonstrating a need for treatment response predictors. We identify neural correlates of a computational model of reading, which may provide biomarkers to improve therapeutic outcomes. Methods/Study Population: Left hemisphere stroke survivors (LHSS) (n = 52) performed an oral reading task and tests of semantic and phonological processing. Artificial neural network (ANN) models, mapping between orthography (visual word form), phonology (auditory word form), and semantics (word meaning), were trained to read single words at an adult reading level. Stroke was simulated by removing percentages (in 10% intervals) of the connections into and out of semantics, phonology, and the combination thereof. The lesioned model producing the smallest average Euclidean distance over word and pseudoword reading accuracy to each LHSS was selected as the matched model. Two voxelwise lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) analyses identified the neural correlates of the percent of phonological and semantic links removed in the matched models. Results/Anticipated Results: Model reading was correlated with LHSS reading (high-frequency regular words, r(48) = 0.96; high-frequency irregular words, r(48) = 0.94; low-frequency regular words, r(48) = 0.97); low-frequency irregular words, r(48) = 0.85; all p’s Discussion/Significance of Impact: Our results show that ANN models of reading, when closely matched to LHSS reading performance, directly connect cognitive processes to the brain. Using matched models as a precision medicine framework to predict therapy response or to identify targets for neurostimulation provides a valuable route toward improving poststroke language outcomes.

Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 9(s1)
Georgetown University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

34 Cognitive models of reading are also models of the brain: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of reading — Andrew T. DeMarco, Peter E. Turkeltaub, et al. · Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS