Potential of anogenital distance as a genetic selection trait in Canadian Holsteins

Maintaining optimal fertility in dairy cattle herds is a global challenge that is typically addressed through the genetic selection of fertility indicator traits. However, many of the traits currently implemented in breeding programs are heavily influenced by environmental factors, resulting in a slow rate of genetic improvement. Anogenital distance (AGD) has recently emerged as a promising fertility indicator trait due to its association with favorable reproductive outcomes and its higher heritability estimates compared with currently evaluated traits. This study aimed to enhance the understanding of AGD's genetic potential by estimating its genetic parameters in Canadian Holsteins, assessing the reliability of breeding values, comparing pedigree BLUP to single-step genomic BLUP approaches, and estimating the correlation between AGD breeding values and those of currently evaluated traits. The dataset used in this study comprised 5,541 Canadian Holstein cows and heifers from 20 herds, collected between 2015 and 2020. The final dataset consisted of 4,988 animals with AGD phenotypes after filtering. The pedigree-based heritability estimate for AGD was 0.39 ± 0.04, whereas the incorporation of genomics resulted in a lower estimate of 0.37 ± 0.03. The reliability of estimated breeding values ranged from 0.49 ± 0.03 for phenotyped animals to 0.81 ± 0.05 for proven sires with at least 30 phenotyped daughters. The integration of genomic information improved the reliability of breeding values, with gains ranging from 0.01 gain for proven sires to 0.14 relative gain for unproven sires. High gain in observed reliability for females without records was demonstrated when genomic information was included, using both split forward validation (0.26) and 5-fold cross-validation (0.14). The AGD breeding values showed moderate unfavorable correlations with relative breeding values of age at first service and production traits including milk yield, fat yield, and protein yield. This suggests that AGD may influence reproductive maturity in heifers but could also have an unfavorable association with production traits, highlighting the need for balanced breeding strategies that consider both fertility and production outcomes. Future studies should aim to expand phenotype data across lifetimes and breeds and estimate genetic correlations with traditional reproduction and production traits using multitrait models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-26021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential of anogenital distance as a genetic selection trait in Canadian Holsteins

T.C. Bruinjé, Flávio Schramm Schenkel, Christine F. Baes, M. Gobikrushanth et al.
1 citations
Journal of Dairy Science
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.82
article

Potential of anogenital distance as a genetic selection trait in Canadian Holsteins

T.C. Bruinjé, Flávio Schramm Schenkel, Christine F. Baes, M. Gobikrushanth, J.E. Carrelli, M. Oba, D.J. Ambrose, F. Miglior, Gabriella Roby Dodd
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Maintaining optimal fertility in dairy cattle herds is a global challenge that is typically addressed through the genetic selection of fertility indicator traits. However, many of the traits currently implemented in breeding programs are heavily influenced by environmental factors, resulting in a slow rate of genetic improvement. Anogenital distance (AGD) has recently emerged as a promising fertility indicator trait due to its association with favorable reproductive outcomes and its higher heritability estimates compared with currently evaluated traits. This study aimed to enhance the understanding of AGD's genetic potential by estimating its genetic parameters in Canadian Holsteins, assessing the reliability of breeding values, comparing pedigree BLUP to single-step genomic BLUP approaches, and estimating the correlation between AGD breeding values and those of currently evaluated traits. The dataset used in this study comprised 5,541 Canadian Holstein cows and heifers from 20 herds, collected between 2015 and 2020. The final dataset consisted of 4,988 animals with AGD phenotypes after filtering. The pedigree-based heritability estimate for AGD was 0.39 ± 0.04, whereas the incorporation of genomics resulted in a lower estimate of 0.37 ± 0.03. The reliability of estimated breeding values ranged from 0.49 ± 0.03 for phenotyped animals to 0.81 ± 0.05 for proven sires with at least 30 phenotyped daughters. The integration of genomic information improved the reliability of breeding values, with gains ranging from 0.01 gain for proven sires to 0.14 relative gain for unproven sires. High gain in observed reliability for females without records was demonstrated when genomic information was included, using both split forward validation (0.26) and 5-fold cross-validation (0.14). The AGD breeding values showed moderate unfavorable correlations with relative breeding values of age at first service and production traits including milk yield, fat yield, and protein yield. This suggests that AGD may influence reproductive maturity in heifers but could also have an unfavorable association with production traits, highlighting the need for balanced breeding strategies that consider both fertility and production outcomes. Future studies should aim to expand phenotype data across lifetimes and breeds and estimate genetic correlations with traditional reproduction and production traits using multitrait models.

Journal of Dairy ScienceVol. 108(5)
University of Alberta (CA), South Dakota State University (US), University of Guelph (CA), James Cook University (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.