A new surgical method for the correction of unilateral alar base retraction

Aim: Alar base retraction is a challenging deformity to correct, and various approaches have been suggested for fixing it with or without other nasal cone deformities. We focus on the surgical techniques for correcting unilateral alar base retraction, reporting their principles, applicability, and complications, and presenting our new method. Material and Methods: Several established methods are available to correct alar base retraction, including conchal cartilage margin grafting, non-excisional suture techniques, excisional suture techniques, and tissue rearrangement, which can be used alone or in combination Whether utilizing a closed technique or an open technique, we access underneath the periosteum through a small gingival incision made at the level of the canine tooth, and we release the soft tissue by detaching the periosteum from the bone while remaining lateral to the nares. Elevation merges with the elevation of the nasal bone periosteum. The mucosa is sutured using a single stitch. Results: This new technique avoids the major pitfalls of traditional methods, with excellent results and high patient satisfaction. A total of 55 patients were enrolled in this study, and all completed the follow-up. Based on data before and after the operation, clinical outcomes showed significant differences in nostril height (especially on the surgical side compared to the non-surgical side), columellar length, nasolabial angle, and patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Many methods are applicable for correcting alar base retraction, but complete correction without relapse is challenging. New surgical procedures must be developed based mainly on underlying causative factors, alar medialization capabilities without tissue trimming, and strong nasal base support that avoids potential problems, such as limited alar base widening or dislocation of alar base manipulating techniques. These principles do not interfere with or contradict any previous methods. Still, they are instead intended to build upon them and contribute to newer and more standardized results with less relapse. The context of the present techniques will help to understand and give a more concrete idea of comprehension for the newer methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1637230
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new surgical method for the correction of unilateral alar base retraction

Oğuzhan Oğuz, Agah Yeni̇çeri̇
Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

A new surgical method for the correction of unilateral alar base retraction

Oğuzhan Oğuz, Agah Yeni̇çeri̇
article en

Abstract

Aim: Alar base retraction is a challenging deformity to correct, and various approaches have been suggested for fixing it with or without other nasal cone deformities. We focus on the surgical techniques for correcting unilateral alar base retraction, reporting their principles, applicability, and complications, and presenting our new method. Material and Methods: Several established methods are available to correct alar base retraction, including conchal cartilage margin grafting, non-excisional suture techniques, excisional suture techniques, and tissue rearrangement, which can be used alone or in combination Whether utilizing a closed technique or an open technique, we access underneath the periosteum through a small gingival incision made at the level of the canine tooth, and we release the soft tissue by detaching the periosteum from the bone while remaining lateral to the nares. Elevation merges with the elevation of the nasal bone periosteum. The mucosa is sutured using a single stitch. Results: This new technique avoids the major pitfalls of traditional methods, with excellent results and high patient satisfaction. A total of 55 patients were enrolled in this study, and all completed the follow-up. Based on data before and after the operation, clinical outcomes showed significant differences in nostril height (especially on the surgical side compared to the non-surgical side), columellar length, nasolabial angle, and patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Many methods are applicable for correcting alar base retraction, but complete correction without relapse is challenging. New surgical procedures must be developed based mainly on underlying causative factors, alar medialization capabilities without tissue trimming, and strong nasal base support that avoids potential problems, such as limited alar base widening or dislocation of alar base manipulating techniques. These principles do not interfere with or contradict any previous methods. Still, they are instead intended to build upon them and contribute to newer and more standardized results with less relapse. The context of the present techniques will help to understand and give a more concrete idea of comprehension for the newer methods.

Turkish Journal of Clinics and LaboratoryVol. 16(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.