Biostratigraphic Zonation for the Cenomanian – Santonian Succession of the Abu Sennan Oilfield,Abu Gharadig Basin, Egypt

Foraminifera, ostracod and calcareous nannofossil contents of the Cenomanian-Santonian succession are integrated to enhance and refine biostratigraphic divisions and age determinations in the Abu Sennan oil field, Abu Gharadig basin, North Western Desert, Egypt. Foraminiferal (seven), ostracod (eleven) and calcareous nannofossil (seven) zones were identified and correlated with international and local zonal schemes. The boundary of the Santonian age (within Khoman Formation) is delineated by the first appearance of the foraminifera Dicarinella concavata and D. canaliculata; the ostracod Brachycythere angulata and the calcareous nannofossil Zeugrhabdotus scutula and Lithastrinus septenarius. The Campanian age of Khoman B is not recorded due to the existence of a local unconformity surface. The Coniacian–Santonian boundary (top Abu Roash AMember) is characterized by the first appearance of the foraminifera Discorbis turonicus, D. minutum and D. simplex, the ostracodHermanites juxi, Oertliella? dextrospinata, and Cythereis cretaria and the calcareous nannofossil species Quadrum intermedium. The Turonian-Coniacian boundary (base of Abu Roash A Member) is delineated by the first appearance of the ostracod species Spinoleberis yotvataensis yotvataensis, Antepaijenborchella sp. and Cythereis rawashensis rawashensis and the calcareous nannofossils Quadrum giganteum.The boundary between the Cenomanian and Turonian (at basal part of Abu Roash EMember) ismarked by the first appearance of the foraminifera Guembelitria cenomana, Daxia cenomana and Thomasinella punica, the ostracod species Amphicytherura distincta, Veeniacythereis streblolophata and Cytherella aegyptiensis and the calcareous nannofossils species Corollithion kennedyi, Owenia hillii and Calculites cenomanicus. The recorded missing within ages is mainly due to structural elements except for the Campanian of Khoman B which is related to a local unconformity. Paleoenvironmentally, the lithological characteristics and fossil associations indicate that all members of the Abu Roash Formation and the upper part of the Bahariya Formation range from subtidal to inner shelf, except the basal part of Abu Roash E, Abu Roash F andKhoman Bmemberswere depositedwithin openmarine settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Stratigraphy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29041/strat.22.1.01
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biostratigraphic Zonation for the Cenomanian – Santonian Succession of the Abu Sennan Oilfield,Abu Gharadig Basin, Egypt

Mahmoud Faris, Abdel-Mohsen M. Morsi, Omar H. Cherif, Samah El-Nahas et al.
Stratigraphy
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Biostratigraphic Zonation for the Cenomanian – Santonian Succession of the Abu Sennan Oilfield,Abu Gharadig Basin, Egypt

Mahmoud Faris, Abdel-Mohsen M. Morsi, Omar H. Cherif, Samah El-Nahas, Mohamed Boukhary, Sami Morsi
article en

Abstract

Foraminifera, ostracod and calcareous nannofossil contents of the Cenomanian-Santonian succession are integrated to enhance and refine biostratigraphic divisions and age determinations in the Abu Sennan oil field, Abu Gharadig basin, North Western Desert, Egypt. Foraminiferal (seven), ostracod (eleven) and calcareous nannofossil (seven) zones were identified and correlated with international and local zonal schemes. The boundary of the Santonian age (within Khoman Formation) is delineated by the first appearance of the foraminifera Dicarinella concavata and D. canaliculata; the ostracod Brachycythere angulata and the calcareous nannofossil Zeugrhabdotus scutula and Lithastrinus septenarius. The Campanian age of Khoman B is not recorded due to the existence of a local unconformity surface. The Coniacian–Santonian boundary (top Abu Roash AMember) is characterized by the first appearance of the foraminifera Discorbis turonicus, D. minutum and D. simplex, the ostracodHermanites juxi, Oertliella? dextrospinata, and Cythereis cretaria and the calcareous nannofossil species Quadrum intermedium. The Turonian-Coniacian boundary (base of Abu Roash A Member) is delineated by the first appearance of the ostracod species Spinoleberis yotvataensis yotvataensis, Antepaijenborchella sp. and Cythereis rawashensis rawashensis and the calcareous nannofossils Quadrum giganteum.The boundary between the Cenomanian and Turonian (at basal part of Abu Roash EMember) ismarked by the first appearance of the foraminifera Guembelitria cenomana, Daxia cenomana and Thomasinella punica, the ostracod species Amphicytherura distincta, Veeniacythereis streblolophata and Cytherella aegyptiensis and the calcareous nannofossils species Corollithion kennedyi, Owenia hillii and Calculites cenomanicus. The recorded missing within ages is mainly due to structural elements except for the Campanian of Khoman B which is related to a local unconformity. Paleoenvironmentally, the lithological characteristics and fossil associations indicate that all members of the Abu Roash Formation and the upper part of the Bahariya Formation range from subtidal to inner shelf, except the basal part of Abu Roash E, Abu Roash F andKhoman Bmemberswere depositedwithin openmarine settings.

StratigraphyVol. 22(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.