Unbridled Right to Reproduce for Domesticated Animals—More Harm Than Good? A Reply to Siemieniec

Abstract Unrestricted reproductive rights for domesticated animals, including the right to roam freely, will have serious consequences for domesticated animals in today's world. While political and legal theories focus on population control to justify fertility restrictions, they do so to save animals’ lives, and one consequence of restricting domesticated animals’ reproductive rights is many more animal deaths. Further, theorists have explored whether population control methods unjustifiably infringe on animals’ rights and argue that at least some are not only justified but arguably mandated under animal rights theories. And finally, it is doubtful today that unbridled reproductive rights for domesticated animals that protect their rights to freedom of association and mobility is in their best interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Ethics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.15.1.09
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unbridled Right to Reproduce for Domesticated Animals—More Harm Than Good? A Reply to Siemieniec

Joan E. Schaffner
Journal of Animal Ethics
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Unbridled Right to Reproduce for Domesticated Animals—More Harm Than Good? A Reply to Siemieniec

Joan E. Schaffner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Unrestricted reproductive rights for domesticated animals, including the right to roam freely, will have serious consequences for domesticated animals in today's world. While political and legal theories focus on population control to justify fertility restrictions, they do so to save animals’ lives, and one consequence of restricting domesticated animals’ reproductive rights is many more animal deaths. Further, theorists have explored whether population control methods unjustifiably infringe on animals’ rights and argue that at least some are not only justified but arguably mandated under animal rights theories. And finally, it is doubtful today that unbridled reproductive rights for domesticated animals that protect their rights to freedom of association and mobility is in their best interests.

Journal of Animal EthicsVol. 15(1)
George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.