Collective mindfulness research: gap-spotting and problematization

Purpose Ample research has explored the benefits of mindfulness in organizations. However, research in the sub-stream of collective mindfulness remains nascent. Though the diverse conceptualizations of collective mindfulness add richness to our understanding, a lack of specificity, imprecise definitions and flexible interpretations impede research progress. This paper identifies the discrepancies, gaps and inconsistencies that need scholarly attention for advancing research. Design/methodology/approach Reviewing the literature and using a combination of gap-spotting and problematization approaches, this conceptual paper seeks to unveil the theoretical issues and discrepancies that must be addressed for progressing research in this captivating area. Findings The study highlights several research gaps and questionable assumptions in the current understanding and operationalization of collective mindfulness and emphasizes the need for a careful examination of the extant conceptualizations. It also suggests potential avenues for future research, which in turn, can guide the application of mindfulness in organizations. Originality/value This study presents a critical philosophical inquiry into the debatable and under-addressed aspects of the extant research on collective mindfulness. While several review studies have investigated the mindfulness concept, this is among the first review papers focusing exclusively on “collective” mindfulness. Insights from this study can inform future empirical studies in this burgeoning area of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Decision
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/md-12-2023-2253
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective mindfulness research: gap-spotting and problematization

Kyle Bruce, Munish Thakur, Aniruddha Chatterjee
1 citations
Management Decision
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
2.31
article

Collective mindfulness research: gap-spotting and problematization

Kyle Bruce, Munish Thakur, Aniruddha Chatterjee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Ample research has explored the benefits of mindfulness in organizations. However, research in the sub-stream of collective mindfulness remains nascent. Though the diverse conceptualizations of collective mindfulness add richness to our understanding, a lack of specificity, imprecise definitions and flexible interpretations impede research progress. This paper identifies the discrepancies, gaps and inconsistencies that need scholarly attention for advancing research. Design/methodology/approach Reviewing the literature and using a combination of gap-spotting and problematization approaches, this conceptual paper seeks to unveil the theoretical issues and discrepancies that must be addressed for progressing research in this captivating area. Findings The study highlights several research gaps and questionable assumptions in the current understanding and operationalization of collective mindfulness and emphasizes the need for a careful examination of the extant conceptualizations. It also suggests potential avenues for future research, which in turn, can guide the application of mindfulness in organizations. Originality/value This study presents a critical philosophical inquiry into the debatable and under-addressed aspects of the extant research on collective mindfulness. While several review studies have investigated the mindfulness concept, this is among the first review papers focusing exclusively on “collective” mindfulness. Insights from this study can inform future empirical studies in this burgeoning area of research.

Management DecisionVol. 64(3)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Wentworth Institute of Technology (US), T A Pai Management Institute (IN), Xavier School (PH), Xavier School of Management (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.