Turkish validity and reliability study of the Auditory Localization Questionnaire and examination of its correlation with the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire

Abstract Background To investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Auditory Localization Questionnaire (ALQ) and to examine the correlation of this questionnaire with the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ). Methods Individuals aged 18–60 with normal hearing (55 adults) and bilateral hearing loss (HL) (65 adults) were included in the study. The adults with bilateral HL were divided into two groups: bilateral hearing aid (HA) users (35 adults) and non-HA users (30 adults). These participants were asked to complete a demographic information form, SHQ, and the ALQ. Results In the HA group, the aided pure tone average (PTA) was 34.85 ± 10.58 dB, the unaided PTA was 66.97 ± 13.81 dB in the right ear, and the aided PTA was 33.22 ± 9.70 dB, the unaided PTA was 60.48 ± 12.88 dB in the left ear. For all individuals with HL who had never used HA, the group’s right ear PTA was 45.34 ± 14.28 dB, and the left ear PTA was 41.62 ± 11.39 dB. SHQ and ALQ had a moderately negative correlation for all groups. There was no significant difference between the ALQ and SHQ scores of those with HL ( p > 0.05). Both questionnaire scores were worse in participants with HL, regardless of HA use than in those with normal hearing ( p < 0.05). The analysis revealed that the ALQ consisted of a five-factor structure in the HL and a six-factor structure in the control. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of ALQ was determined to be 0.88 for the HL group and 0.90 for the control group. Conclusions The ALQ is valid and reliable for evaluating individuals with HL. Although SHQ and the ALQ have no significant difference subscales, their subfactors evaluate auditory localization and spatial hearing in different situations. No significant positive effect of bilateral HA on spatial hearing and auditory localization was detected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00797-4
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turkish validity and reliability study of the Auditory Localization Questionnaire and examination of its correlation with the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire

Büşra Kaynakoğlu, Handan Turan Dizdar, Arzu Kırbaç, Azize Arzu Koçyiğit
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Noise Effects and Management
article

Turkish validity and reliability study of the Auditory Localization Questionnaire and examination of its correlation with the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire

Büşra Kaynakoğlu, Handan Turan Dizdar, Arzu Kırbaç, Azize Arzu Koçyiğit
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish Auditory Localization Questionnaire (ALQ) and to examine the correlation of this questionnaire with the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ). Methods Individuals aged 18–60 with normal hearing (55 adults) and bilateral hearing loss (HL) (65 adults) were included in the study. The adults with bilateral HL were divided into two groups: bilateral hearing aid (HA) users (35 adults) and non-HA users (30 adults). These participants were asked to complete a demographic information form, SHQ, and the ALQ. Results In the HA group, the aided pure tone average (PTA) was 34.85 ± 10.58 dB, the unaided PTA was 66.97 ± 13.81 dB in the right ear, and the aided PTA was 33.22 ± 9.70 dB, the unaided PTA was 60.48 ± 12.88 dB in the left ear. For all individuals with HL who had never used HA, the group’s right ear PTA was 45.34 ± 14.28 dB, and the left ear PTA was 41.62 ± 11.39 dB. SHQ and ALQ had a moderately negative correlation for all groups. There was no significant difference between the ALQ and SHQ scores of those with HL ( p > 0.05). Both questionnaire scores were worse in participants with HL, regardless of HA use than in those with normal hearing ( p < 0.05). The analysis revealed that the ALQ consisted of a five-factor structure in the HL and a six-factor structure in the control. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of ALQ was determined to be 0.88 for the HL group and 0.90 for the control group. Conclusions The ALQ is valid and reliable for evaluating individuals with HL. Although SHQ and the ALQ have no significant difference subscales, their subfactors evaluate auditory localization and spatial hearing in different situations. No significant positive effect of bilateral HA on spatial hearing and auditory localization was detected.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 41(1)
Selçuk University (TR), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR), Eskişehir Osmangazi University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Noise Effects and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.