Policy priorities for improving Global Innovation Index score and innovative performance in upper-middle-income countries: Implications for Armenia

As an upper-middle-income country, Armenia should develop and implement targeted policies, such as increased R&D investments, education reforms, and industry-academia collaboration, to enhance its innovation performance. Strengthening these areas is expected to contribute to higher Global Innovation Index (GII) rankings, reflecting improved national innovation capacity.This study aims to estimate the impact of various GII components (including pillars, sub-indices, and sub-pillars) on the overall GII and pillar scores for upper-middle-income countries. Based on these findings, the study seeks to identify Armenia’s key policy priorities and provide targeted recommendations for enhancing its innovation performance. This study employs a cross-sectional regression to analyze the factors influencing GII scores in upper-middle-income countries, assessing the impact of sub-indices, pillars, and sub-pillars. The analysis reveals that market sophistication and creative outputs strongly influence GII scores among upper-middle-income countries, contributing significantly to national innovation performance. Additionally, knowledge and technology outputs, human capital and research, and infrastructure pillars show a statistically significant impact at the 5% level. Notably, even minor improvements in innovation output sub-index scores account for substantial variations in GII rankings. These findings suggest that Armenia should prioritize targeted education reforms, increase R&D investment, and strengthen university-industry linkages to enhance its innovation ecosystem and improve its global competitiveness. AcknowledgmentThe research was supported by the Science Committee of the Republic of Armenia within the framework of the project No. 21T-5B234.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.43
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy priorities for improving Global Innovation Index score and innovative performance in upper-middle-income countries: Implications for Armenia

Svitlana Bilan, Gayane Tovmasyan, Svetlana Dallakyan, A. R. Makaryan et al.
2 citations
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Innovation Policy and R&D
6.26
article

Policy priorities for improving Global Innovation Index score and innovative performance in upper-middle-income countries: Implications for Armenia

Svitlana Bilan, Gayane Tovmasyan, Svetlana Dallakyan, A. R. Makaryan, H. Mkrtchyan, Verej Isanians, Harutyun S. Sargsyan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As an upper-middle-income country, Armenia should develop and implement targeted policies, such as increased R&D investments, education reforms, and industry-academia collaboration, to enhance its innovation performance. Strengthening these areas is expected to contribute to higher Global Innovation Index (GII) rankings, reflecting improved national innovation capacity.This study aims to estimate the impact of various GII components (including pillars, sub-indices, and sub-pillars) on the overall GII and pillar scores for upper-middle-income countries. Based on these findings, the study seeks to identify Armenia’s key policy priorities and provide targeted recommendations for enhancing its innovation performance. This study employs a cross-sectional regression to analyze the factors influencing GII scores in upper-middle-income countries, assessing the impact of sub-indices, pillars, and sub-pillars. The analysis reveals that market sophistication and creative outputs strongly influence GII scores among upper-middle-income countries, contributing significantly to national innovation performance. Additionally, knowledge and technology outputs, human capital and research, and infrastructure pillars show a statistically significant impact at the 5% level. Notably, even minor improvements in innovation output sub-index scores account for substantial variations in GII rankings. These findings suggest that Armenia should prioritize targeted education reforms, increase R&D investment, and strengthen university-industry linkages to enhance its innovation ecosystem and improve its global competitiveness. AcknowledgmentThe research was supported by the Science Committee of the Republic of Armenia within the framework of the project No. 21T-5B234.

Problems and Perspectives in ManagementVol. 23(1)
Northwestern University (US), Yerevan State University (AM), Armenian State University of Economics (AM), NexusCRO (India) (IN), Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khachatur Abovian (AM), Széchenyi István University (HU), National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (AM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovation Policy and R&D
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.