Investigation of Asphalt Mixture Balanced Design Method Based on Intermediate Layer Properties

The determination of the optimal asphalt content in aggregate mix design is currently conducted independently of the pavement structure. This approach fails to consider the characteristics of the pavement structure, such as layer positioning and thickness. As a result, there is a significant disconnect between the structural design of asphalt pavements and the material design of the mixtures. This limitation hampers the full and effective utilization of the deformation and crack resistance capabilities of each layer of asphalt mixture. To address this issue, this study focuses on the commonly used AC-20 asphalt mixture in the intermediate layer of asphalt pavements. The Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT) and overlay test (OT) were employed to evaluate the high-temperature rutting resistance and low-temperature crack resistance of the mixture, respectively. The effective range of asphalt content was first established through these tests. Additionally, the VESYS rutting prediction model was utilized to obtain the permanent deformation parameters of the asphalt mixture through experimental data. The rutting prediction was calculated based on the deflection values at the top and bottom of the asphalt layer. The optimal range of asphalt content for the intermediate layer was then determined by combining the rutting contribution rate derived from a finite element model with the allowable rut depth value for the intermediate layer. By considering the characteristics of the asphalt layer position and achieving a relative balance between the crack resistance and deformation resistance capabilities of the asphalt mixture, this study proposes a new design method for determining the optimal asphalt content. This method is of great significance for subsequent engineering applications. The feasibility of this design method was demonstrated using the intermediate layer of asphalt pavement on high-grade highways as an example. The research results show that the asphalt content designed by the balanced design method (BDM), based on the rutting resistance performance of the intermediate layer for this pavement structure and material type, is 4.3%–4.6%. In actual engineering practice, it is recommended to use 4.4% as the optimal asphalt content for AC-20.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Coatings
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings15040384
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of Asphalt Mixture Balanced Design Method Based on Intermediate Layer Properties

HU Xin-he, Qi Mao, Xiang‐Long Chen, Yong Zheng et al.
Coatings
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Investigation of Asphalt Mixture Balanced Design Method Based on Intermediate Layer Properties

HU Xin-he, Qi Mao, Xiang‐Long Chen, Yong Zheng, Jie Yu, Gang Cheng
article en

Abstract

The determination of the optimal asphalt content in aggregate mix design is currently conducted independently of the pavement structure. This approach fails to consider the characteristics of the pavement structure, such as layer positioning and thickness. As a result, there is a significant disconnect between the structural design of asphalt pavements and the material design of the mixtures. This limitation hampers the full and effective utilization of the deformation and crack resistance capabilities of each layer of asphalt mixture. To address this issue, this study focuses on the commonly used AC-20 asphalt mixture in the intermediate layer of asphalt pavements. The Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT) and overlay test (OT) were employed to evaluate the high-temperature rutting resistance and low-temperature crack resistance of the mixture, respectively. The effective range of asphalt content was first established through these tests. Additionally, the VESYS rutting prediction model was utilized to obtain the permanent deformation parameters of the asphalt mixture through experimental data. The rutting prediction was calculated based on the deflection values at the top and bottom of the asphalt layer. The optimal range of asphalt content for the intermediate layer was then determined by combining the rutting contribution rate derived from a finite element model with the allowable rut depth value for the intermediate layer. By considering the characteristics of the asphalt layer position and achieving a relative balance between the crack resistance and deformation resistance capabilities of the asphalt mixture, this study proposes a new design method for determining the optimal asphalt content. This method is of great significance for subsequent engineering applications. The feasibility of this design method was demonstrated using the intermediate layer of asphalt pavement on high-grade highways as an example. The research results show that the asphalt content designed by the balanced design method (BDM), based on the rutting resistance performance of the intermediate layer for this pavement structure and material type, is 4.3%–4.6%. In actual engineering practice, it is recommended to use 4.4% as the optimal asphalt content for AC-20.

CoatingsVol. 15(4)
Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai Harbour Engineering Design & Research Institute (CN), Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN), Wuhan Institute of Technology (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.