Uncovering potential interviewer-related biases in self-efficacy assessment: a study among chronic disease patients

Given that no DIF was detected concerning interviewers, our findings indicate that an objective assessment of self-efficacy in a face-to-face interview may be feasible, provided that interviewers receive appropriate training. Since DIF effects concerning other patients characteristics found were small, the GSE may provide a relatively bias free way to assess self-efficacy in an interview setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02579-2
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncovering potential interviewer-related biases in self-efficacy assessment: a study among chronic disease patients

Monja Michelitsch, V. Winkler, Andrea Berghold, Martin Weger et al.
BMC Psychology
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Uncovering potential interviewer-related biases in self-efficacy assessment: a study among chronic disease patients

Monja Michelitsch, V. Winkler, Andrea Berghold, Martin Weger, Alexander Avian, Sanja Strini, Julia Groß, Thomas Falb, Maximilian Gabriel, Manuel Großpötzl, Magdalena Holter, Andreas Wedrich, Agnes M. Kloft
article en

Abstract

Given that no DIF was detected concerning interviewers, our findings indicate that an objective assessment of self-efficacy in a face-to-face interview may be feasible, provided that interviewers receive appropriate training. Since DIF effects concerning other patients characteristics found were small, the GSE may provide a relatively bias free way to assess self-efficacy in an interview setting.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Medical University of Graz (AT), Aalto University (FI)
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Medizinische Universität Graz
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.