Quantum Algorithms for the Pathwise Lasso

We present a novel quantum high-dimensional linear regression algorithm with an <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>&amp;#x2113;</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>-penalty based on the classical LARS (Least Angle Regression) pathwise algorithm. Similarly to available classical algorithms for Lasso, our quantum algorithm provides the full regularisation path as the penalty term varies, but quadratically faster per iteration under specific conditions. A quadratic speedup on the number of features <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math> is possible by using the simple quantum minimum-finding subroutine from Dürr and Hoyer (arXiv'96) in order to obtain the joining time at each iteration. We then improve upon this simple quantum algorithm and obtain a quadratic speedup both in the number of features <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math> and the number of observations <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math> by using the approximate quantum minimum-finding subroutine from Chen and de Wolf (ICALP'23). In order to do so, we approximately compute the joining times to be searched over by the approximate quantum minimum-finding subroutine. As another main contribution, we prove, via an approximate version of the KKT conditions and a duality gap, that the LARS algorithm (and therefore our quantum algorithm) is robust to errors. This means that it still outputs a path that minimises the Lasso cost function up to a small error if the joining times are only approximately computed. Furthermore, we show that, when the observations are sampled from a Gaussian distribution, our quantum algorithm's complexity only depends polylogarithmically on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math>, exponentially better than the classical LARS algorithm, while keeping the quadratic improvement on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math>. Moreover, we propose a dequantised version of our quantum algorithm that also retains the polylogarithmic dependence on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math>, albeit presenting the linear scaling on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math> from the standard LARS algorithm. Finally, we prove query lower bounds for classical and quantum Lasso algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantum
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-03-25-1674
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum Algorithms for the Pathwise Lasso

Tushar Vaidya, Patrick Rebentrost, João F. Doriguello, Chi Seng Pun et al.
3 citations
Quantum
Quantum Information and Cryptography
7.44
article

Quantum Algorithms for the Pathwise Lasso

Tushar Vaidya, Patrick Rebentrost, João F. Doriguello, Chi Seng Pun, Debbie Lim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We present a novel quantum high-dimensional linear regression algorithm with an <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>&amp;#x2113;</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>-penalty based on the classical LARS (Least Angle Regression) pathwise algorithm. Similarly to available classical algorithms for Lasso, our quantum algorithm provides the full regularisation path as the penalty term varies, but quadratically faster per iteration under specific conditions. A quadratic speedup on the number of features <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math> is possible by using the simple quantum minimum-finding subroutine from Dürr and Hoyer (arXiv'96) in order to obtain the joining time at each iteration. We then improve upon this simple quantum algorithm and obtain a quadratic speedup both in the number of features <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math> and the number of observations <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math> by using the approximate quantum minimum-finding subroutine from Chen and de Wolf (ICALP'23). In order to do so, we approximately compute the joining times to be searched over by the approximate quantum minimum-finding subroutine. As another main contribution, we prove, via an approximate version of the KKT conditions and a duality gap, that the LARS algorithm (and therefore our quantum algorithm) is robust to errors. This means that it still outputs a path that minimises the Lasso cost function up to a small error if the joining times are only approximately computed. Furthermore, we show that, when the observations are sampled from a Gaussian distribution, our quantum algorithm's complexity only depends polylogarithmically on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math>, exponentially better than the classical LARS algorithm, while keeping the quadratic improvement on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math>. Moreover, we propose a dequantised version of our quantum algorithm that also retains the polylogarithmic dependence on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math>, albeit presenting the linear scaling on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math> from the standard LARS algorithm. Finally, we prove query lower bounds for classical and quantum Lasso algorithms.

QuantumVol. 9
Centre for Quantum Technologies (SG), HUN-REN Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics (HU), National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), University of Latvia (LV)
National Research Foundation Singapore, Ministry of Education - Singapore, European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.