Unraveling the resilience strategies for supply chain network designs

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how these networks associate with supply chain resilience. The need for robust strategies to ensure the resilience of supply chains has emerged critically in today’s increasingly volatile and globally interconnected economy. Resilience imposes a significant impact on the strategic long-term decision-making of organizations, including the configuration of their supply chain network. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the resilience measures for supply chain network designs (SCND) structures: centralized, decentralized, and distributed. Using a global survey of over 900 supply chain professionals, quantitative methods are employed to analyze associations between the SCND structures and eight resilience strategies along with 18 capabilities. Findings Findings reveal that distributed supply chains exhibit higher associations with 14 of the resilience measures. Distributed networks offer greater responsiveness and robustness in response to disruptions by more effectively enabling anticipation, sustainability, visibility, flexibility, adaptability, strategic alignment, and supply chain collaboration, compared to centralized networks. The survey responses also confirm two distinct factor classifications for resilience capabilities, which are consistent with the proactive and reactive measures commonly reported in the literature. Practical implications Understanding the role of different SCNDs in fostering resilience is indispensable for organizations to enhance their risk mitigation practices, ensure the long-term continuity of their performance, and leverage the flexibility of the composable enterprise to quickly adapt to disruptions. Originality/value This research addresses a critical gap in the existing literature by providing empirical, data-driven insights into how different SCNDs are associated with supply chain resilience.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Supply Chain Management An International Journal
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-10-2024-0676
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unraveling the resilience strategies for supply chain network designs

Yvonne Lederer Antonucci, Mathias Kirchmer, Afrooz Moatari‐Kazerouni
3 citations
Supply Chain Management An International Journal
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
6.68
article

Unraveling the resilience strategies for supply chain network designs

Yvonne Lederer Antonucci, Mathias Kirchmer, Afrooz Moatari‐Kazerouni
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how these networks associate with supply chain resilience. The need for robust strategies to ensure the resilience of supply chains has emerged critically in today’s increasingly volatile and globally interconnected economy. Resilience imposes a significant impact on the strategic long-term decision-making of organizations, including the configuration of their supply chain network. Design/methodology/approach This study examines the resilience measures for supply chain network designs (SCND) structures: centralized, decentralized, and distributed. Using a global survey of over 900 supply chain professionals, quantitative methods are employed to analyze associations between the SCND structures and eight resilience strategies along with 18 capabilities. Findings Findings reveal that distributed supply chains exhibit higher associations with 14 of the resilience measures. Distributed networks offer greater responsiveness and robustness in response to disruptions by more effectively enabling anticipation, sustainability, visibility, flexibility, adaptability, strategic alignment, and supply chain collaboration, compared to centralized networks. The survey responses also confirm two distinct factor classifications for resilience capabilities, which are consistent with the proactive and reactive measures commonly reported in the literature. Practical implications Understanding the role of different SCNDs in fostering resilience is indispensable for organizations to enhance their risk mitigation practices, ensure the long-term continuity of their performance, and leverage the flexibility of the composable enterprise to quickly adapt to disruptions. Originality/value This research addresses a critical gap in the existing literature by providing empirical, data-driven insights into how different SCNDs are associated with supply chain resilience.

Supply Chain Management An International JournalVol. 30(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unraveling the resilience strategies for supply chain network designs — Yvonne Lederer Antonucci, Mathias Kirchmer, et al. · Supply Chain Management An International Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS