Practical Geospatial Ethics: Concerns, Codes, and Cases

This paper is one of a diverse set of contributions to a special issue of Cartographic Perspectives focused on cartographic ethics. Throughout it situates cartography within a broader geospatial context and discusses ethics in relation to professional practice in that field. First the paper considers the nature of ethical concerns expressed within the industry, government, and academic sectors of the geospatial enterprise, and speculates on how those concerns have evolved since CP first addressed ethics in the early 1990s. Second, it considers the roles of professional ethics codes and how relevant codes and rules relate to evolving ethical concerns. Thirdly, the paper highlights characteristics of ethics case studies, and the utility of formal case study analysis. It suggests how practitioners’ stories about ethical challenges can be adapted to “actionable” case studies that can be used to hone geospatial professionals’ and organizations’ ethical problem-solving abilities. The paper concludes with arguments that case studies may be key to elevating ethics within cartography and geospatial curricula in higher education, as well as in training large language model AIs to provide reasonable ethical advice to human mapmakers and users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cartographic Perspectives
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14714/cp105.1935
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Geospatial Ethics: Concerns, Codes, and Cases

David DiBiase
Cartographic Perspectives
Geographic Information Systems Studies
article

Practical Geospatial Ethics: Concerns, Codes, and Cases

David DiBiase
article en

Abstract

This paper is one of a diverse set of contributions to a special issue of Cartographic Perspectives focused on cartographic ethics. Throughout it situates cartography within a broader geospatial context and discusses ethics in relation to professional practice in that field. First the paper considers the nature of ethical concerns expressed within the industry, government, and academic sectors of the geospatial enterprise, and speculates on how those concerns have evolved since CP first addressed ethics in the early 1990s. Second, it considers the roles of professional ethics codes and how relevant codes and rules relate to evolving ethical concerns. Thirdly, the paper highlights characteristics of ethics case studies, and the utility of formal case study analysis. It suggests how practitioners’ stories about ethical challenges can be adapted to “actionable” case studies that can be used to hone geospatial professionals’ and organizations’ ethical problem-solving abilities. The paper concludes with arguments that case studies may be key to elevating ethics within cartography and geospatial curricula in higher education, as well as in training large language model AIs to provide reasonable ethical advice to human mapmakers and users.

Cartographic Perspectives
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practical Geospatial Ethics: Concerns, Codes, and Cases — David DiBiase · Cartographic Perspectives (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS