Do Government Audits Reduce Budgetary Non-Compliance?<br>—An Empirical Analysis of Budget Execution Audits in Central Government Departments in China

Over the years, audit reports released by audit departments have highlighted numerous instances of budgetary non-compliance during budget execution, involving substantial amounts of budget funds. Some of these non-compliance issues are closely related to budget adjustments. Although budget adjustments do not necessarily involve budgetary non-compliance, irregularities in budget adjustments undermine the legitimacy of the budget and the sustainability of public finances. To effectively regulate budget adjustments, reduce instances of budgetary non-compliance, and improve the standardization of budget execution, we established panel data on the budget execution audit of central departments from 2008 to 2017 to analyze the impact of government audit coverage, supervisory functions, and advisory functions on budgetary non-compliance. The results are as follows: Firstly, there is a significant negative correlation between budget adjustments and budgetary non-compliance, with the regulation of budget adjustments being effectively strengthened. Secondly, audit coverage is significantly negatively correlated with budgetary non-compliance, while audit supervision functions show a significant positive correlation with budgetary non-compliance. However, the advisory functions have yet to demonstrate their effectiveness. Thirdly, audit functions do not exhibit a relationship with budgetary non-compliance in the subsequent year, indicating that the deterrent effect of government audits requires further improvement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/chnstd.2025.142006
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Government Audits Reduce Budgetary Non-Compliance?<br>&#8212;An Empirical Analysis of Budget Execution Audits in Central Government Departments in China

Guo Xian, Mingyue Wen, Xiaojun Luo
2 citations
Chinese Studies
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
6.26
article

Do Government Audits Reduce Budgetary Non-Compliance?<br>&#8212;An Empirical Analysis of Budget Execution Audits in Central Government Departments in China

Guo Xian, Mingyue Wen, Xiaojun Luo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Over the years, audit reports released by audit departments have highlighted numerous instances of budgetary non-compliance during budget execution, involving substantial amounts of budget funds. Some of these non-compliance issues are closely related to budget adjustments. Although budget adjustments do not necessarily involve budgetary non-compliance, irregularities in budget adjustments undermine the legitimacy of the budget and the sustainability of public finances. To effectively regulate budget adjustments, reduce instances of budgetary non-compliance, and improve the standardization of budget execution, we established panel data on the budget execution audit of central departments from 2008 to 2017 to analyze the impact of government audit coverage, supervisory functions, and advisory functions on budgetary non-compliance. The results are as follows: Firstly, there is a significant negative correlation between budget adjustments and budgetary non-compliance, with the regulation of budget adjustments being effectively strengthened. Secondly, audit coverage is significantly negatively correlated with budgetary non-compliance, while audit supervision functions show a significant positive correlation with budgetary non-compliance. However, the advisory functions have yet to demonstrate their effectiveness. Thirdly, audit functions do not exhibit a relationship with budgetary non-compliance in the subsequent year, indicating that the deterrent effect of government audits requires further improvement.

Chinese StudiesVol. 14(02)
Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.