A scoring method for differentiating incidental ovarian endometriotic cysts from ovarian cystadenomas based on CT and clinical features

Detecting and distinguishing between ovarian endometriotic cysts and ovarian cystadenomas using computed tomography (CT) scans is a clinical challenge due to their similar CT characteristics. This study aims to identify key CT and clinical features that can effectively differentiate these two diseases and to develop a simple and practical scoring system. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 202 patients who underwent pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT at two medical centers. The subjects were divided into training cohort (n=151) and validation cohort (n=51). Utilizing univariate analyses and binary logistic regression, predictive factors for ovarian endometriotic cysts and ovarian cystadenomas were identified to construct an initial model. Subsequently, a scoring system was developed by assigning weights to each feature based on the initial model. The accuracy of both models (the initial model and the scoring system) was quantified by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We further determined the optimal cutoff point for the scoring system (0 – 15 points) and established three predictive ranges based on the probabilities of ovarian endometriotic cyst occurrence (<7 points; 7 – 8 points; >8 points). The initial model, which incorporated two clinical factors (age and CA125level) and three CT characteristics (wall thickness, density heterogeneity, and edgeadhesion), demonstrated an AUC of 0.993. In the training cohort, the proportionsof patients correctly diagnosed with ovarian endometriotic cysts within these threescore ranges were 0%, 38.89%, and 96.83%, respectively, while in the validationcohort, they were 0%, 33.33%, and 95.00%. Thus, having a refined scoring range canhelp improve diagnostic accuracy, with a higher score indicating a diagnosis withovarian endometriosis cysts, and assist with differentiating patients with differentrisk levels.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/ejmo.8507
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoring method for differentiating incidental ovarian endometriotic cysts from ovarian cystadenomas based on CT and clinical features

Jiner Shu, Tingting Xu, Qiaoling Ding, Xiaoming Wu et al.
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

A scoring method for differentiating incidental ovarian endometriotic cysts from ovarian cystadenomas based on CT and clinical features

Jiner Shu, Tingting Xu, Qiaoling Ding, Xiaoming Wu, Jianbin He, Xiaochen Xu, Ri-Sheng Yu, Xue Liu, Jianxia Xu
article en

Abstract

Detecting and distinguishing between ovarian endometriotic cysts and ovarian cystadenomas using computed tomography (CT) scans is a clinical challenge due to their similar CT characteristics. This study aims to identify key CT and clinical features that can effectively differentiate these two diseases and to develop a simple and practical scoring system. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 202 patients who underwent pre-operative contrast-enhanced CT at two medical centers. The subjects were divided into training cohort (n=151) and validation cohort (n=51). Utilizing univariate analyses and binary logistic regression, predictive factors for ovarian endometriotic cysts and ovarian cystadenomas were identified to construct an initial model. Subsequently, a scoring system was developed by assigning weights to each feature based on the initial model. The accuracy of both models (the initial model and the scoring system) was quantified by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We further determined the optimal cutoff point for the scoring system (0 – 15 points) and established three predictive ranges based on the probabilities of ovarian endometriotic cyst occurrence (<7 points; 7 – 8 points; >8 points). The initial model, which incorporated two clinical factors (age and CA125level) and three CT characteristics (wall thickness, density heterogeneity, and edgeadhesion), demonstrated an AUC of 0.993. In the training cohort, the proportionsof patients correctly diagnosed with ovarian endometriotic cysts within these threescore ranges were 0%, 38.89%, and 96.83%, respectively, while in the validationcohort, they were 0%, 33.33%, and 95.00%. Thus, having a refined scoring range canhelp improve diagnostic accuracy, with a higher score indicating a diagnosis withovarian endometriosis cysts, and assist with differentiating patients with differentrisk levels.

Eurasian Journal of Medicine and OncologyVol. 9(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.