481 Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting for treatment of hydrocephalus in patients with myelomeningocele

Objectives/Goals: Optimal hydrocephalus treatment with permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in myelomeningocele (MMC) patients is not well understood, especially how treatment response varies with time of MMC repair. We evaluate two treatment methods in this population–endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Methods/Study Population: We retrospectively identified patients from St. Louis Children’s Hospital who were diagnosed with MMC prenatally and underwent either prenatal or postnatal repair and subsequently underwent permanent treatment for hydrocephalus (VPS or ETV +/- choroid plexus cauterization) between 2018 and 2024. The primary outcome was failure (defined as need for revision) of procedure and time to failure. All revisions were shunt insertions/revisions. Differences in preoperative and 6-month postoperative head circumference (HC) and WHO standard HC z-score were examined. Differences in preoperative and 6-month follow-up fronto-occipital horn ratios (FOHR), a validated age-independent measure of CSF within the brain, on CT and MRI were additionally examined. Results/Anticipated Results: Eighty-three MMC patients were identified. 46 (55%) underwent CSF diversion: 37 (80.4%, 9 pre- and 28 postnatal) VPS and 9 (19.6%, 5 pre- and 4 postnatal) ETV +/- choroid plexus cauterization. Six (16%) VPS patients required revision vs. 3 (33%) ETV patients (∆17%; 95% CI -9 – 50). Mean time to failure was longer after VPS vs. ETV (516, SD 470 vs. 34, SD 7 days) [∆482; 95% CI 163 – 800]. The decrease between pre- and postoperative FOHR was greater after VPS vs. ETV (6 mo: -0.14, SD 0.10 vs. -0.03, SD 0.07) [∆0.11; 95% CI 0.04 – 0.18]. Differences in pre- and postoperative HC were similar (VPS 5.67, SD 2.91 vs. ETV 4.04, SD 1.66 cm) [∆1.63; 95% CI -0.71 – 3.98]. Greater, but not significant, z-score decreases were seen after VPS vs. ETV (-1.04, SD 2.22 vs. -0.13, SD 1.11) [∆-0.91; 95% CI -2.68 – 0.86]. Similar trends were observed in pre- and postnatal MMC repair groups. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Failure rates in MMC-associated hydrocephalus patients were greater in the ETV group, but no definitive conclusion can be made due to imprecision. Those treated with ETV have less time to failure and smaller FOHR decreases than those treated with VPS, indicating less CSF drainage. Due to the need for more subjects, future research should be multicenter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.1072
Primary Topic
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

481 Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting for treatment of hydrocephalus in patients with myelomeningocele

Sasidhar Karuparti, Francisco José García‐Peñalvo, Jennifer M. Strahle, Ashlynn Lizer
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
article

481 Endoscopic third ventriculostomy versus ventriculoperitoneal shunting for treatment of hydrocephalus in patients with myelomeningocele

Sasidhar Karuparti, Francisco José García‐Peñalvo, Jennifer M. Strahle, Ashlynn Lizer
article en

Abstract

Objectives/Goals: Optimal hydrocephalus treatment with permanent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in myelomeningocele (MMC) patients is not well understood, especially how treatment response varies with time of MMC repair. We evaluate two treatment methods in this population–endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Methods/Study Population: We retrospectively identified patients from St. Louis Children’s Hospital who were diagnosed with MMC prenatally and underwent either prenatal or postnatal repair and subsequently underwent permanent treatment for hydrocephalus (VPS or ETV +/- choroid plexus cauterization) between 2018 and 2024. The primary outcome was failure (defined as need for revision) of procedure and time to failure. All revisions were shunt insertions/revisions. Differences in preoperative and 6-month postoperative head circumference (HC) and WHO standard HC z-score were examined. Differences in preoperative and 6-month follow-up fronto-occipital horn ratios (FOHR), a validated age-independent measure of CSF within the brain, on CT and MRI were additionally examined. Results/Anticipated Results: Eighty-three MMC patients were identified. 46 (55%) underwent CSF diversion: 37 (80.4%, 9 pre- and 28 postnatal) VPS and 9 (19.6%, 5 pre- and 4 postnatal) ETV +/- choroid plexus cauterization. Six (16%) VPS patients required revision vs. 3 (33%) ETV patients (∆17%; 95% CI -9 – 50). Mean time to failure was longer after VPS vs. ETV (516, SD 470 vs. 34, SD 7 days) [∆482; 95% CI 163 – 800]. The decrease between pre- and postoperative FOHR was greater after VPS vs. ETV (6 mo: -0.14, SD 0.10 vs. -0.03, SD 0.07) [∆0.11; 95% CI 0.04 – 0.18]. Differences in pre- and postoperative HC were similar (VPS 5.67, SD 2.91 vs. ETV 4.04, SD 1.66 cm) [∆1.63; 95% CI -0.71 – 3.98]. Greater, but not significant, z-score decreases were seen after VPS vs. ETV (-1.04, SD 2.22 vs. -0.13, SD 1.11) [∆-0.91; 95% CI -2.68 – 0.86]. Similar trends were observed in pre- and postnatal MMC repair groups. Discussion/Significance of Impact: Failure rates in MMC-associated hydrocephalus patients were greater in the ETV group, but no definitive conclusion can be made due to imprecision. Those treated with ETV have less time to failure and smaller FOHR decreases than those treated with VPS, indicating less CSF drainage. Due to the need for more subjects, future research should be multicenter.

Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 9(s1)
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.