Silk fibroin-hyaluronic acid nanofibers for peripheral nerve regeneration

Peripheral nerve injuries are common and a major source of pain that can lead to debilitating loss of function. Current treatments are limited, with autologous nerve grafts being the gold standard treatment for nerve injuries. However, autografting is not always successful and can lead to increased debilitation through donor site morbidity. Tissue engineering seeks to improve nerve injury treatment though the use of nerve conduits. Conduits made from a functional biomaterial can be implanted into a nerve injury site encouraging and controlling axonal regrowth without causing additional harm to the patient. Both silk fibroin (SF) and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been proven successful in the field of neural tissue engineering. SF has excellent mechanical properties and is biocompatible. HA is part of the extracellular matrix and had been used in nerve regeneration applications. This study developed aligned combination SF-HA nanofibers through electrospinning that could be used within a nerve conduit. Both materials were methacrylated to allow for photocrosslinking and additional control over material properties. Methcrylated SF-HA was tested alongside a material containing only methacrylated HA that has already proven to be effective in literature. When characterizing the materials, it was found that through chemical methacrylation HA was substituted at 60% while SF reported a 30% substitution. Electrospun SF-HA nanofibers were found to have a greater diameter than HA fibers; however, SF-HA was found to be more aligned with greater surface hydrophobicity. Mechanically, it was found that both materials exceeded the elastic modulus of native tissue, but SF-HA far exceeded HA in elasticity and overall fiber extension. Furthermore, human Schwann cells attached, proliferated, and released more pro-regenerative growth factors on SF-HA than HA. Dorsal root ganglia neurons also displayed longer neurite extensions on SF-HA fibers. We concluded that SF-HA nanofibers have potential as a nerve conduit material.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomaterials Applications
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08853282251329315
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Silk fibroin-hyaluronic acid nanofibers for peripheral nerve regeneration

Harini G. Sundararaghavan, Judy Senanayake, Madeline R Badrak, Ahmad Zunnu Rain
2 citations
Journal of Biomaterials Applications
Silk-based biomaterials and applications
1.19
article

Silk fibroin-hyaluronic acid nanofibers for peripheral nerve regeneration

Harini G. Sundararaghavan, Judy Senanayake, Madeline R Badrak, Ahmad Zunnu Rain
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries are common and a major source of pain that can lead to debilitating loss of function. Current treatments are limited, with autologous nerve grafts being the gold standard treatment for nerve injuries. However, autografting is not always successful and can lead to increased debilitation through donor site morbidity. Tissue engineering seeks to improve nerve injury treatment though the use of nerve conduits. Conduits made from a functional biomaterial can be implanted into a nerve injury site encouraging and controlling axonal regrowth without causing additional harm to the patient. Both silk fibroin (SF) and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been proven successful in the field of neural tissue engineering. SF has excellent mechanical properties and is biocompatible. HA is part of the extracellular matrix and had been used in nerve regeneration applications. This study developed aligned combination SF-HA nanofibers through electrospinning that could be used within a nerve conduit. Both materials were methacrylated to allow for photocrosslinking and additional control over material properties. Methcrylated SF-HA was tested alongside a material containing only methacrylated HA that has already proven to be effective in literature. When characterizing the materials, it was found that through chemical methacrylation HA was substituted at 60% while SF reported a 30% substitution. Electrospun SF-HA nanofibers were found to have a greater diameter than HA fibers; however, SF-HA was found to be more aligned with greater surface hydrophobicity. Mechanically, it was found that both materials exceeded the elastic modulus of native tissue, but SF-HA far exceeded HA in elasticity and overall fiber extension. Furthermore, human Schwann cells attached, proliferated, and released more pro-regenerative growth factors on SF-HA than HA. Dorsal root ganglia neurons also displayed longer neurite extensions on SF-HA fibers. We concluded that SF-HA nanofibers have potential as a nerve conduit material.

Journal of Biomaterials ApplicationsVol. 40(2)
Wayne State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Silk-based biomaterials and applications
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.