Decoding market reactions: Analysis of divergent signals of ESG ratings

This study examines how ESG ratings influence investor behavior, emphasizing the variations across rating agencies. Using daily market reactions in returns and trading volumes of 1100 North American and European firms from 2017 to 2023, the analysis identifies variations in market reactions between ESG score changes from Bloomberg and MSCI. Notably, abnormal trading volumes without abnormal returns point to two types of market ambiguity - uncertainty and disagreement - affecting ESG-related price signals. The findings underscore the need to reduce investor ambiguity to enhance market efficiency, with potential roadblocks being the limited availability, divergence, and unclear materiality of ESG information. • This study identifies a reaction divergence across ESG rating disclosures from different raters. • Reaction divergence is defined as differences in market-level outcomes. • Reaction divergence may be driven by 2 forms of ambiguity: investor uncertainty and disagreement. • There is a need for greater transparency, standardization, and ‘democratization’ of ESG ratings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Financial Analysis
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104161
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding market reactions: Analysis of divergent signals of ESG ratings

Felix Bachner
9 citations
International Review of Financial Analysis
Market Dynamics and Volatility
28.18
article

Decoding market reactions: Analysis of divergent signals of ESG ratings

Felix Bachner
article en
9 citations

Abstract

This study examines how ESG ratings influence investor behavior, emphasizing the variations across rating agencies. Using daily market reactions in returns and trading volumes of 1100 North American and European firms from 2017 to 2023, the analysis identifies variations in market reactions between ESG score changes from Bloomberg and MSCI. Notably, abnormal trading volumes without abnormal returns point to two types of market ambiguity - uncertainty and disagreement - affecting ESG-related price signals. The findings underscore the need to reduce investor ambiguity to enhance market efficiency, with potential roadblocks being the limited availability, divergence, and unclear materiality of ESG information. • This study identifies a reaction divergence across ESG rating disclosures from different raters. • Reaction divergence is defined as differences in market-level outcomes. • Reaction divergence may be driven by 2 forms of ambiguity: investor uncertainty and disagreement. • There is a need for greater transparency, standardization, and ‘democratization’ of ESG ratings.

International Review of Financial AnalysisVol. 103
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
28.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.