Frequency of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia with Closed Tracheal Suction versus Open Tracheal Suction

Objective: To determine frequency of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) with closed tracheal suction versus open tracheal suction. Study Design: Quasi Experimental Study. Place and Duration of Study: Medical ICU, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, Jul to Dec 2023. Methodology: Patients aged >15 years of either gender who underwent mechanical ventilation for above 48 hours were incorporated in this research. Patients not willing to take part, already diagnosed with pneumonia or pre-existing respiratory illness at the time of admission in intensive care unit and patients were intubated for more than 48 hours before admission to ICU were omitted. Selected 86 patients were allotted one of the two groups: Group C and Group O. Tracheal suction of Group C and Group O was performed using closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) and open tracheal suction system (OTSS) respectively. VAP occurrence as well as ventilator days of the two groups were compared. Duration of mechanical ventilation and developing VAP after 48 hours of intubation were recorded. Results: In O group, there were 25(58.13%) male patients and 18(41.86%) females. Thirteen out of 43 patients in C group (30.23%) developed VAP compared with 16 out of 43 patients (37.21%) in O group (p=0.494). In addition, mean number of ventilator days was 8.16±2.32 and 8.21±3.09 in C and O group respectively (p=0.937). Conclusion: Closed tracheal suction failed to decrease the frequency of VAP and ventilator days.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75isuppl-2.11443
Primary Topic
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia with Closed Tracheal Suction versus Open Tracheal Suction

Kamil Hussain Qureshi, Junaid Zafar, Bilal Ahmad, Murtaza Saleem et al.
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
article

Frequency of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia with Closed Tracheal Suction versus Open Tracheal Suction

Kamil Hussain Qureshi, Junaid Zafar, Bilal Ahmad, Murtaza Saleem, Abdul Rasheed, Syed Asif Akbar Shah
article en

Abstract

Objective: To determine frequency of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) with closed tracheal suction versus open tracheal suction. Study Design: Quasi Experimental Study. Place and Duration of Study: Medical ICU, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, Jul to Dec 2023. Methodology: Patients aged >15 years of either gender who underwent mechanical ventilation for above 48 hours were incorporated in this research. Patients not willing to take part, already diagnosed with pneumonia or pre-existing respiratory illness at the time of admission in intensive care unit and patients were intubated for more than 48 hours before admission to ICU were omitted. Selected 86 patients were allotted one of the two groups: Group C and Group O. Tracheal suction of Group C and Group O was performed using closed tracheal suction system (CTSS) and open tracheal suction system (OTSS) respectively. VAP occurrence as well as ventilator days of the two groups were compared. Duration of mechanical ventilation and developing VAP after 48 hours of intubation were recorded. Results: In O group, there were 25(58.13%) male patients and 18(41.86%) females. Thirteen out of 43 patients in C group (30.23%) developed VAP compared with 16 out of 43 patients (37.21%) in O group (p=0.494). In addition, mean number of ventilator days was 8.16±2.32 and 8.21±3.09 in C and O group respectively (p=0.937). Conclusion: Closed tracheal suction failed to decrease the frequency of VAP and ventilator days.

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical JournalVol. 75(SUPPL-2)
National University of Medical Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.