Manometric scale of pelvic floor muscles strength in prostatectomized men

Abstract Introduction: An assessment of muscle contraction is necessary to optimize therapeutic targets and control the evolution of stress urinary incontinence rehabilitation. Digital palpation in conjunction with perineometer are reliable for scientific requirements. However, the absence of reference values in manometer affects reading the assessment results. Objective: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in prostatectomized men. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy at Hospital dos Servidores (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). We evaluated a total of 100 patients, aged 51 to 78 years, who undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy. An expert performed the test using a perineometer. PFM strength data were collected and classified according to results. An evaluated scale was developed. Results: The Normal distribution of the PFM strength was estimated by use of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS d = 0.13; p = 0.10). Removal of nine outliers. The measurement of PFM strength of 91 participants was 56,4 ± 33 cmH2O. From these results, the manometric scale of the PFM strength was developed: excellent (above 123 cmH2O), very good (from 90 to 122 cmH2O), good (from 57 to 89 cmH2O), regular (from 24 to 56 cmH2O), and insufficient (below 23 cmH2O). Conclusion: The method developed has advantages: to eliminate predictor error, and to bridge the gaps among categories where PFM strength is not divided into grade levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fisioterapia em Movimento
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2025.38104
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manometric scale of pelvic floor muscles strength in prostatectomized men

Patrí­cia Zaidan, Elirez Bezerra da Silva, Ana D. Fernandes
Fisioterapia em Movimento
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Manometric scale of pelvic floor muscles strength in prostatectomized men

Patrí­cia Zaidan, Elirez Bezerra da Silva, Ana D. Fernandes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: An assessment of muscle contraction is necessary to optimize therapeutic targets and control the evolution of stress urinary incontinence rehabilitation. Digital palpation in conjunction with perineometer are reliable for scientific requirements. However, the absence of reference values in manometer affects reading the assessment results. Objective: To develop a classification scale for manometry of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in prostatectomized men. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Physiotherapy at Hospital dos Servidores (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). We evaluated a total of 100 patients, aged 51 to 78 years, who undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy. An expert performed the test using a perineometer. PFM strength data were collected and classified according to results. An evaluated scale was developed. Results: The Normal distribution of the PFM strength was estimated by use of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS d = 0.13; p = 0.10). Removal of nine outliers. The measurement of PFM strength of 91 participants was 56,4 ± 33 cmH2O. From these results, the manometric scale of the PFM strength was developed: excellent (above 123 cmH2O), very good (from 90 to 122 cmH2O), good (from 57 to 89 cmH2O), regular (from 24 to 56 cmH2O), and insufficient (below 23 cmH2O). Conclusion: The method developed has advantages: to eliminate predictor error, and to bridge the gaps among categories where PFM strength is not divided into grade levels.

Fisioterapia em MovimentoVol. 38
Universidade Santa Úrsula (BR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.