Objectivising Heritage Assessment with Values: Criteria-Based Grid and Constructivist Approach

The concept of value seems to have capital importance both in the scientific literature and in various heritage actors’ professional discourse. The actions undertaken to develop the built environment inherited from previous generations seem to depend on the value we assign it. In this essay, the concepts of value, assessor, and heritage assessment are discussed. Two historical contexts are compared: the classical axiology of the 19th century based on the Enlightenment search for rationality and the typologies of contemporary values struggling with complexity. This historical reassessment shows a complexification and multiplication of evaluation grids, as well as the need to question the subjectivity inherent in heritage actors’ decisions. In order to not sink into excessive relativism definitively discrediting any attempt to make the process of heritage assessments more objective, a dynamic point of view is proposed, linking the constructivist approach with the use of a criteria-based value grid.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8040116
Citations
3
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectivising Heritage Assessment with Values: Criteria-Based Grid and Constructivist Approach

Morgane Bos, David A. Vandenbroucke, Dorothée Stiernon, Damien Claeys
3 citations
Heritage
BIM and Construction Integration
3.02
article

Objectivising Heritage Assessment with Values: Criteria-Based Grid and Constructivist Approach

Morgane Bos, David A. Vandenbroucke, Dorothée Stiernon, Damien Claeys
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The concept of value seems to have capital importance both in the scientific literature and in various heritage actors’ professional discourse. The actions undertaken to develop the built environment inherited from previous generations seem to depend on the value we assign it. In this essay, the concepts of value, assessor, and heritage assessment are discussed. Two historical contexts are compared: the classical axiology of the 19th century based on the Enlightenment search for rationality and the typologies of contemporary values struggling with complexity. This historical reassessment shows a complexification and multiplication of evaluation grids, as well as the need to question the subjectivity inherent in heritage actors’ decisions. In order to not sink into excessive relativism definitively discrediting any attempt to make the process of heritage assessments more objective, a dynamic point of view is proposed, linking the constructivist approach with the use of a criteria-based value grid.

HeritageVol. 8(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
BIM and Construction Integration
3.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Objectivising Heritage Assessment with Values: Criteria-Based Grid and Constructivist Approach — Morgane Bos, David A. Vandenbroucke, et al. · Heritage (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS