Exploring the role of peers in addressing the toxic drug crisis in emergency departments

Introduction: Health systems across Canada are facing high numbers of patients who use substances, have a diagnosed substance use disorder, or are experiencing a toxic drug poisoning, necessitating innovative approaches to care. The article discusses a unique pilot project that incorporates individuals with experience using unregulated substances (i.e., peers) into emergency departments to improve patient outcomes and enhance staff satisfaction, in response to the significant impact of the toxic drug crisis on healthcare systems. Methods: The project used an overarching Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement framework, and an adapted ‘Four Approaches to Evaluation’ to assess the impacts of embedding peers into the emergency department. Data collection included quantitative/qualitative intake forms, patient/staff experience surveys, and a focus group. Results: The most common reasons for peer encounters (N = 764) were emotional support, harm reduction, referrals, witnessed consumption, and requests for necessities. The patient survey (N = 51) results demonstrated how the peers helped majority of patients feel safe and more supported while accessing emergency care. ED staff (N = 22) shared positive experiences with the new program, citing improvements in quality of life, access to harm reduction services, and creating a more supportive health system. During focus groups, peers (N = 2) outlined the importance of having this role embedded into emergency departments to ensure patients are receiving the care they need in a high-stress environment that, historically, has had the potential to cause significant harm through stigma and biases to people who use substances. Conclusion: Integrating peers into EDs during the toxic drug crisis has greatly improved support for both patients and staff. This approach boosts staff morale, reduces workload stress, decreases stigma, and enhances patient care. Overall, it optimizes resources and strengthens both patient and provider experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing
Published
2025-03-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/cjen248
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the role of peers in addressing the toxic drug crisis in emergency departments

Kelly Wood, J. H. Black, Mary Van Osch, J. Tarnow et al.
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Emergency Nursing
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
article

Exploring the role of peers in addressing the toxic drug crisis in emergency departments

Kelly Wood, J. H. Black, Mary Van Osch, J. Tarnow, Rita Metwally, Aven Sidhu, Tracy Stoneson, Kassaundra Benoit
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Health systems across Canada are facing high numbers of patients who use substances, have a diagnosed substance use disorder, or are experiencing a toxic drug poisoning, necessitating innovative approaches to care. The article discusses a unique pilot project that incorporates individuals with experience using unregulated substances (i.e., peers) into emergency departments to improve patient outcomes and enhance staff satisfaction, in response to the significant impact of the toxic drug crisis on healthcare systems. Methods: The project used an overarching Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement framework, and an adapted ‘Four Approaches to Evaluation’ to assess the impacts of embedding peers into the emergency department. Data collection included quantitative/qualitative intake forms, patient/staff experience surveys, and a focus group. Results: The most common reasons for peer encounters (N = 764) were emotional support, harm reduction, referrals, witnessed consumption, and requests for necessities. The patient survey (N = 51) results demonstrated how the peers helped majority of patients feel safe and more supported while accessing emergency care. ED staff (N = 22) shared positive experiences with the new program, citing improvements in quality of life, access to harm reduction services, and creating a more supportive health system. During focus groups, peers (N = 2) outlined the importance of having this role embedded into emergency departments to ensure patients are receiving the care they need in a high-stress environment that, historically, has had the potential to cause significant harm through stigma and biases to people who use substances. Conclusion: Integrating peers into EDs during the toxic drug crisis has greatly improved support for both patients and staff. This approach boosts staff morale, reduces workload stress, decreases stigma, and enhances patient care. Overall, it optimizes resources and strengthens both patient and provider experiences.

Canadian Journal of Emergency NursingVol. 48(1)
Fraser Health (CA), National Patient Safety Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
1.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.