Assessing Passive Sampling for the Monitoring of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> spp. in Environmental Waters

Passive sampling has shown promise as an alternative approach for monitoring of pathogens in aquatic matrices. We conducted two controlled experiments to compare the efficacy of membrane passive sampling to composite sampling in both wastewater and surface water for the detection of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i>. We also investigated the relative uptake of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> onto membrane passive samplers over time. Both sampling methods returned positive detections of <i>E. coli</i> at all deployment times (4, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) in both water matrices. Passive sampling for <i>Cryptosporidium</i> showed similar detection rates as composite samples in surface water (31% passive; 41% composite) and wastewater (76% passive; 86% composite). We found significant linear uptake of <i>E. coli</i> onto passive samplers up to 96 h in surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.932; <i>p</i> = 0.002). In wastewater, maximum passive sampler uptake of <i>E. coli</i> was reached after 24 h. For <i>Cryptosporidium</i>, linear uptake was observed up to 96 h for both surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.805; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and wastewater (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.877; <i>p</i> = 0.006). Our results support that membrane passive samplers may be used for the detection of <i>Cryptosporidium</i> and <i>E. coli</i> in surface waters for up to 96 h.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c01029
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fecal contamination and water quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Passive Sampling for the Monitoring of E. coli and Cryptosporidium spp. in Environmental Waters

Beth L. Parker, Heather Murphy, Ilya Law, Brandon S. Spoja et al.
4 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Fecal contamination and water quality
3.27
article

Assessing Passive Sampling for the Monitoring of E. coli and Cryptosporidium spp. in Environmental Waters

Beth L. Parker, Heather Murphy, Ilya Law, Brandon S. Spoja, Erin L. Becker, David McCarthy, Martha S. Yiridoe, Katrina Kobal, Abdul Alashraf
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Passive sampling has shown promise as an alternative approach for monitoring of pathogens in aquatic matrices. We conducted two controlled experiments to compare the efficacy of membrane passive sampling to composite sampling in both wastewater and surface water for the detection of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i>. We also investigated the relative uptake of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Cryptosporidium</i> onto membrane passive samplers over time. Both sampling methods returned positive detections of <i>E. coli</i> at all deployment times (4, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) in both water matrices. Passive sampling for <i>Cryptosporidium</i> showed similar detection rates as composite samples in surface water (31% passive; 41% composite) and wastewater (76% passive; 86% composite). We found significant linear uptake of <i>E. coli</i> onto passive samplers up to 96 h in surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.932; <i>p</i> = 0.002). In wastewater, maximum passive sampler uptake of <i>E. coli</i> was reached after 24 h. For <i>Cryptosporidium</i>, linear uptake was observed up to 96 h for both surface water (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.805; <i>p</i> = 0.015) and wastewater (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.877; <i>p</i> = 0.006). Our results support that membrane passive samplers may be used for the detection of <i>Cryptosporidium</i> and <i>E. coli</i> in surface waters for up to 96 h.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 5(4)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Physical Sciences (United States) (US), Agricultural Institute of Canada (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Canada Research Chairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fecal contamination and water quality
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.