Navigating complexity: appraisal and collection policy practices in university special collections

Purpose This study aims to focus on appraisal practices within university special collections, investigating archivists’ appraisal decision-making processes and their use of collection policies in appraisal work. Design/methodology/approach The study used in-depth semi-structured interviews with 11 university special collection archivists. Each interview focused on the archivists’ appraisal work, including their methods and adherence to institutional guidelines. The interview data were analyzed based on grounded theory. Findings All interview participants recognized the importance of appraisal and emphasized the importance of research value and enduring value. The subjectivity of the appraisal process was acknowledged, with participants relying on collection policies to mitigate subjectivity. Originality/value The value of this study lies in its exploration of the real-world decision-making processes undertaken by university special collection archivists in appraisal and their use of collection policy throughout the procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collection and Curation
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/cc-10-2024-0054
Primary Topic
Museums and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating complexity: appraisal and collection policy practices in university special collections

James Faulkner, Jeonghyun Kim
Collection and Curation
Museums and Cultural Heritage
article

Navigating complexity: appraisal and collection policy practices in university special collections

James Faulkner, Jeonghyun Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to focus on appraisal practices within university special collections, investigating archivists’ appraisal decision-making processes and their use of collection policies in appraisal work. Design/methodology/approach The study used in-depth semi-structured interviews with 11 university special collection archivists. Each interview focused on the archivists’ appraisal work, including their methods and adherence to institutional guidelines. The interview data were analyzed based on grounded theory. Findings All interview participants recognized the importance of appraisal and emphasized the importance of research value and enduring value. The subjectivity of the appraisal process was acknowledged, with participants relying on collection policies to mitigate subjectivity. Originality/value The value of this study lies in its exploration of the real-world decision-making processes undertaken by university special collection archivists in appraisal and their use of collection policy throughout the procedure.

Collection and CurationVol. 45(1)
University of North Texas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Museums and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.