DFT Insights into Hydrogen Spillover Mechanisms: Effects of Metal Species, Size, and Support

Hydrogen spillover is a crucial mechanism in heterogeneous catalysis. Herein, density functional theory calculations were conducted to study the metal–support interactions (MSI) and the hydrogen spillover mechanisms in terms of metal size, metal species, and support effects using single-atom (M1) and four-atom cluster (M4) models of Ru, Ni, and Pt, supported on anatase TiO2(101), rutile TiO2(110), MgO(100), MgO(110), and graphene. For M1 systems, the binding energies (Eb) vary widely across different M1 species and substrate surfaces. In contrast to M1 systems whose MSI are affected by metal type, those supported M4 models are determined primarily by the support: r-TiO2(110) > a-TiO2(101) > MgO(110) > MgO(100) > graphene. Thermodynamically favorable hydrogen spillover on oxide-supported M1 models required hydrogen coverages (θ) of ∼6 ML, whereas counterpart M4 systems require ∼3 ML. Therefore, oxide-supported cluster catalysts can facilitate favorable hydrogen spillover better than single-atom catalysts; hydrogen spillover to TiO2 is more favorable than to MgO. In contrast, no favorable hydrogen spillover was observed on graphene-supported M1 and M4 models. Despite considering the same route, different hydrogen spillover mechanisms are observed depending on the support: (i) on reducible TiO2, hydrogen spills over as a proton with the electron transferred to the support; (ii) on nonreducible MgO, hydrogen spills over as a proton but the electron remains localized to the bound metal; (iii) on graphene, hydrogen spills over as a neutral hydrogen atom. Notably, supported M4 models with stronger MSI are predicted to exhibit a more facile hydrogen spillover from both thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives, particularly when considering the same metal species across different supports. These detailed insights are expected to advance the understanding of hydrogen spillover on catalysts, which will be valuable for their future design and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08097
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DFT Insights into Hydrogen Spillover Mechanisms: Effects of Metal Species, Size, and Support

Yves Ira A. Reyes, Carmine Coluccini, Hsin‐Yi Tiffany Chen, Ho Viet Thang et al.
21 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
10.87
article

DFT Insights into Hydrogen Spillover Mechanisms: Effects of Metal Species, Size, and Support

Yves Ira A. Reyes, Carmine Coluccini, Hsin‐Yi Tiffany Chen, Ho Viet Thang, Cheng-Hsi Yeh
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Hydrogen spillover is a crucial mechanism in heterogeneous catalysis. Herein, density functional theory calculations were conducted to study the metal–support interactions (MSI) and the hydrogen spillover mechanisms in terms of metal size, metal species, and support effects using single-atom (M1) and four-atom cluster (M4) models of Ru, Ni, and Pt, supported on anatase TiO2(101), rutile TiO2(110), MgO(100), MgO(110), and graphene. For M1 systems, the binding energies (Eb) vary widely across different M1 species and substrate surfaces. In contrast to M1 systems whose MSI are affected by metal type, those supported M4 models are determined primarily by the support: r-TiO2(110) > a-TiO2(101) > MgO(110) > MgO(100) > graphene. Thermodynamically favorable hydrogen spillover on oxide-supported M1 models required hydrogen coverages (θ) of ∼6 ML, whereas counterpart M4 systems require ∼3 ML. Therefore, oxide-supported cluster catalysts can facilitate favorable hydrogen spillover better than single-atom catalysts; hydrogen spillover to TiO2 is more favorable than to MgO. In contrast, no favorable hydrogen spillover was observed on graphene-supported M1 and M4 models. Despite considering the same route, different hydrogen spillover mechanisms are observed depending on the support: (i) on reducible TiO2, hydrogen spills over as a proton with the electron transferred to the support; (ii) on nonreducible MgO, hydrogen spills over as a proton but the electron remains localized to the bound metal; (iii) on graphene, hydrogen spills over as a neutral hydrogen atom. Notably, supported M4 models with stronger MSI are predicted to exhibit a more facile hydrogen spillover from both thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives, particularly when considering the same metal species across different supports. These detailed insights are expected to advance the understanding of hydrogen spillover on catalysts, which will be valuable for their future design and development.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry CVol. 129(13)
National Tsing Hua University (TW), University of Da Nang (VN)
National Tsing Hua University, National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Hydrogen Storage and Materials
10.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.