Dynamic Accounting of Carbon Uptake in the Built Environment

Transforming building materials from net life-cycle CO<sub>2</sub>e emitters to carbon sinks is a key pathway towards decarbonizing the industrial sector. Current life-cycle assessments of materials (particularly "low-carbon" materials) often focus on cradle-to-gate emissions, which can exclude emissions and uptake (i.e., fluxes) later in the materials' life-cycle. Further, conventional CO<sub>2</sub>e emission characterization disregards the dynamic effects of the timing of emissions and uptake on cumulative radiative forcing from processes like manufacturing, biomass growth, and the decadal carbon storage in long-lived building materials. This work presents a framework to analyze the cradle-to-grave CO<sub>2</sub>e balance of building materials using a time-dependent global warming potential calculation. We apply this framework in the dynamic accounting of carbon uptake in the built environment (D-CUBE) tool and examine two case studies: concrete and cross-laminated timber (CLT). When accounting for dynamic effects, the long storage time of biogenic carbon in CLT results in reduced warming, while the slow rate of uptake via concrete carbonation does not result in significant reductions in global warming. The D-CUBE tool allows for consistent comparisons across materials and emissions mitigation strategies at varying life-cycle stages and can be adapted to other materials or systems with different lifespans and applications. The flexibility of D-CUBE and the ability to identify CO<sub>2</sub>e emission hot-spot life-cycle stages will be instrumental in identifying pathways to achieving net-carbon-sequestering building materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c00080
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Accounting of Carbon Uptake in the Built Environment

Alissa Kendall, Baishakhi Bose, Josefine A. Olsson, Corinne Donahue Scown et al.
8 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
6.39
article

Dynamic Accounting of Carbon Uptake in the Built Environment

Alissa Kendall, Baishakhi Bose, Josefine A. Olsson, Corinne Donahue Scown, Thomas P. Hendrickson, Sabbie A. Miller, Seth Kane, Elisabeth Van Roijen, Sarah Nordahl, Fan Jin
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Transforming building materials from net life-cycle CO<sub>2</sub>e emitters to carbon sinks is a key pathway towards decarbonizing the industrial sector. Current life-cycle assessments of materials (particularly "low-carbon" materials) often focus on cradle-to-gate emissions, which can exclude emissions and uptake (i.e., fluxes) later in the materials' life-cycle. Further, conventional CO<sub>2</sub>e emission characterization disregards the dynamic effects of the timing of emissions and uptake on cumulative radiative forcing from processes like manufacturing, biomass growth, and the decadal carbon storage in long-lived building materials. This work presents a framework to analyze the cradle-to-grave CO<sub>2</sub>e balance of building materials using a time-dependent global warming potential calculation. We apply this framework in the dynamic accounting of carbon uptake in the built environment (D-CUBE) tool and examine two case studies: concrete and cross-laminated timber (CLT). When accounting for dynamic effects, the long storage time of biogenic carbon in CLT results in reduced warming, while the slow rate of uptake via concrete carbonation does not result in significant reductions in global warming. The D-CUBE tool allows for consistent comparisons across materials and emissions mitigation strategies at varying life-cycle stages and can be adapted to other materials or systems with different lifespans and applications. The flexibility of D-CUBE and the ability to identify CO<sub>2</sub>e emission hot-spot life-cycle stages will be instrumental in identifying pathways to achieving net-carbon-sequestering building materials.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(13)
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), University of California System (US), Energy Biosciences Institute (US), Impact Assessment (US), Joint BioEnergy Institute (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy, Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems, Biological and Environmental Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
6.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.