Accuracy of online symptom assessment applications, large language models, and laypeople for self–triage decisions

Symptom-Assessment Application (SAAs, e.g., NHS 111 online) that assist laypeople in deciding if and where to seek care (self-triage) are gaining popularity and Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used too. However, there is no evidence synthesis on the accuracy of LLMs, and no review has contextualized the accuracy of SAAs and LLMs. This systematic review evaluates the self-triage accuracy of both SAAs and LLMs and compares them to the accuracy of laypeople. A total of 1549 studies were screened and 19 included. The self-triage accuracy of SAAs was moderate but highly variable (11.5-90.0%), while the accuracy of LLMs (57.8-76.0%) and laypeople (47.3-62.4%) was moderate with low variability. Based on the available evidence, the use of SAAs or LLMs should neither be universally recommended nor discouraged; rather, we suggest that their utility should be assessed based on the specific use case and user group under consideration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01566-6
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of online symptom assessment applications, large language models, and laypeople for self–triage decisions

Niklas von Kalckreuth, Markus A. Feufel, Marvin Kopka
18 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
11.78
article

Accuracy of online symptom assessment applications, large language models, and laypeople for self–triage decisions

Niklas von Kalckreuth, Markus A. Feufel, Marvin Kopka
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Symptom-Assessment Application (SAAs, e.g., NHS 111 online) that assist laypeople in deciding if and where to seek care (self-triage) are gaining popularity and Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used too. However, there is no evidence synthesis on the accuracy of LLMs, and no review has contextualized the accuracy of SAAs and LLMs. This systematic review evaluates the self-triage accuracy of both SAAs and LLMs and compares them to the accuracy of laypeople. A total of 1549 studies were screened and 19 included. The self-triage accuracy of SAAs was moderate but highly variable (11.5-90.0%), while the accuracy of LLMs (57.8-76.0%) and laypeople (47.3-62.4%) was moderate with low variability. Based on the available evidence, the use of SAAs or LLMs should neither be universally recommended nor discouraged; rather, we suggest that their utility should be assessed based on the specific use case and user group under consideration.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
11.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.