External validation of artificial intelligence for detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) based on deep-learning of echocardiograms could help address under-recognition in clinical practice, but they require extensive validation, particularly in representative and complex clinical cohorts for which they could provide most value. In this study enrolling patients with HFpEF (cases; n = 240), and age, sex, and year of echocardiogram matched controls (n = 256), we compare the diagnostic performance (discrimination, calibration, classification, and clinical utility) and prognostic associations (mortality and HF hospitalization) between an updated AI HFpEF model (EchoGo Heart Failure v2) and existing clinical scores (H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF). The AI HFpEF model and H2FPEF score demonstrate similar discrimination and calibration, but classification is higher with AI than H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF, attributable to fewer intermediate scores, due to discordant multivariable inputs. The continuous AI HFpEF model output adds information beyond the H2FPEF, and integration with existing scores increases correct management decisions. Those with a diagnostic positive result from AI have a two-fold increased risk of the composite outcome. We conclude that integrating an AI HFpEF model into the existing clinical diagnostic pathway would improve identification of HFpEF in complex clinical cohorts, and patients at risk of adverse outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58283-7
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
22.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External validation of artificial intelligence for detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Jordan B. Strom, Katharine Rainer, Patricia A. Pellikka, William Hawkes et al.
16 citations
Nature Communications
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
22.21
article

External validation of artificial intelligence for detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Jordan B. Strom, Katharine Rainer, Patricia A. Pellikka, William Hawkes, Rasheed Thompson, Ross Upton, Paul Leeson, Nora Al-Roub, Ashley P. Akerman, Constance Angell-James, Lorenzo Bosque, Madeline Cassidy, Hania Piotrowska, Gary Woodward
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) models to identify heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) based on deep-learning of echocardiograms could help address under-recognition in clinical practice, but they require extensive validation, particularly in representative and complex clinical cohorts for which they could provide most value. In this study enrolling patients with HFpEF (cases; n = 240), and age, sex, and year of echocardiogram matched controls (n = 256), we compare the diagnostic performance (discrimination, calibration, classification, and clinical utility) and prognostic associations (mortality and HF hospitalization) between an updated AI HFpEF model (EchoGo Heart Failure v2) and existing clinical scores (H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF). The AI HFpEF model and H2FPEF score demonstrate similar discrimination and calibration, but classification is higher with AI than H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF, attributable to fewer intermediate scores, due to discordant multivariable inputs. The continuous AI HFpEF model output adds information beyond the H2FPEF, and integration with existing scores increases correct management decisions. Those with a diagnostic positive result from AI have a two-fold increased risk of the composite outcome. We conclude that integrating an AI HFpEF model into the existing clinical diagnostic pathway would improve identification of HFpEF in complex clinical cohorts, and patients at risk of adverse outcomes.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Howard University (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Deaconess Hospital (US), Drexel University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
22.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.