Development of Leads to Social Inclusion Why do Similar Projects Have Different Outcomes? A Perspective on Local Government Actors

This study aimed to investigate the factors that contribute to social inclusion through urban redevelopment projects in metropolitan areas. Existing research argues that Japan's urban development system promotes redevelopment projects that prioritize corporate interests, while neglecting the interests of residents. Nevertheless, most redevelopment projects in Japan are led by local governments and their incentives are not limited to attracting corporate investment. Therefore, through case study analysis, this study examines how the involvement of local actors (bureaucrats) in redevelopment projects affects the degree of social inclusion. The hypothesis is that bureaucrat-led redevelopment, which is managed and led by the local administration with the master plan of the city, is likely to lead to social inclusion. The significance of this study is to expand the literature on the impact of gentrification policies on social inclusion by examining the case of Japan and providing suggestions for policymakers seeking sustainable urban development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy & Governance Review
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v9i2.1224
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Leads to Social Inclusion Why do Similar Projects Have Different Outcomes? A Perspective on Local Government Actors

Taketo Terada
Policy & Governance Review
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Development of Leads to Social Inclusion Why do Similar Projects Have Different Outcomes? A Perspective on Local Government Actors

Taketo Terada
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the factors that contribute to social inclusion through urban redevelopment projects in metropolitan areas. Existing research argues that Japan's urban development system promotes redevelopment projects that prioritize corporate interests, while neglecting the interests of residents. Nevertheless, most redevelopment projects in Japan are led by local governments and their incentives are not limited to attracting corporate investment. Therefore, through case study analysis, this study examines how the involvement of local actors (bureaucrats) in redevelopment projects affects the degree of social inclusion. The hypothesis is that bureaucrat-led redevelopment, which is managed and led by the local administration with the master plan of the city, is likely to lead to social inclusion. The significance of this study is to expand the literature on the impact of gentrification policies on social inclusion by examining the case of Japan and providing suggestions for policymakers seeking sustainable urban development.

Policy & Governance ReviewVol. 9(2)
Waseda University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development of Leads to Social Inclusion Why do Similar Projects Have Different Outcomes? A Perspective on Local Government Actors — Taketo Terada · Policy & Governance Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS