Transperitoneal robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal duplication: a comparative clinical analysis

This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in pediatric patients with renal duplication. Data from 105 pediatric patients who underwent surgery for renal duplication at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, between January 2019 and March 2024 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on surgical approach: RALPN and LPN. The RALPN group had a significantly higher mean age (5.10 ± 2.63 years) compared to the LPN group (2.67 ± 2.16 years, p < 0.001). RALPN patients experienced shorter hospital stay (7.3 ± 1.7 days vs. 9.5 ± 3.3 days, p < 0.001)) and higher hospitalization expenses ($5,723 ± 1,322 vs. $1,787 ± 564, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in gender distribution, follow-up duration, BMI, side of surgery, presenting symptoms, coexisting urinary system diseases, or readmission rates between the groups. Intraoperative data showed that RALPN resulted in a trend towards lower blood loss (8.41 ± 3.58 ml vs. 10.73 ± 4.60 ml, p = 0.023) but required a longer total operation time (234.68 ± 58.02 min vs. 185.36 ± 54.07 min, p < 0.001). However, the partial nephrectomy duration was shorter in RALPN (125.45 ± 19.27 min vs. 153.49 ± 48.81 min, p < 0.001). RALPN had faster recovery with shorter durations of postoperative hematuria and catheterization. At 12 months post-surgery, RALPN showed significantly lower anteroposterior diameter of renal pelvis and maximum cross-sectional area of the cyst, indicating better preservation of renal function. Both RALPN and LPN are safe and effective for treating renal duplication in pediatric patients. Despite RALPN is associated with higher hospitalization costs, its overall cost-effectiveness may be comparable to LPN due to fewer complications and faster recovery. Further multicenter, randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94019-9
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transperitoneal robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal duplication: a comparative clinical analysis

Wei He, Jingyi Chen, Kunbin Tang, H. J. Yang et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
1.52
article

Transperitoneal robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal duplication: a comparative clinical analysis

Wei He, Jingyi Chen, Kunbin Tang, H. J. Yang, Shaohua He, Sisi Wang, Di Xu, Jiayue Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in pediatric patients with renal duplication. Data from 105 pediatric patients who underwent surgery for renal duplication at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, between January 2019 and March 2024 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on surgical approach: RALPN and LPN. The RALPN group had a significantly higher mean age (5.10 ± 2.63 years) compared to the LPN group (2.67 ± 2.16 years, p < 0.001). RALPN patients experienced shorter hospital stay (7.3 ± 1.7 days vs. 9.5 ± 3.3 days, p < 0.001)) and higher hospitalization expenses ($5,723 ± 1,322 vs. $1,787 ± 564, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in gender distribution, follow-up duration, BMI, side of surgery, presenting symptoms, coexisting urinary system diseases, or readmission rates between the groups. Intraoperative data showed that RALPN resulted in a trend towards lower blood loss (8.41 ± 3.58 ml vs. 10.73 ± 4.60 ml, p = 0.023) but required a longer total operation time (234.68 ± 58.02 min vs. 185.36 ± 54.07 min, p < 0.001). However, the partial nephrectomy duration was shorter in RALPN (125.45 ± 19.27 min vs. 153.49 ± 48.81 min, p < 0.001). RALPN had faster recovery with shorter durations of postoperative hematuria and catheterization. At 12 months post-surgery, RALPN showed significantly lower anteroposterior diameter of renal pelvis and maximum cross-sectional area of the cyst, indicating better preservation of renal function. Both RALPN and LPN are safe and effective for treating renal duplication in pediatric patients. Despite RALPN is associated with higher hospitalization costs, its overall cost-effectiveness may be comparable to LPN due to fewer complications and faster recovery. Further multicenter, randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Fujian Provincial Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.