Diagnosis and treatment of synthetic mid-urethral sling complications

Synthetic Mid-Urethral Slings (SMUS) have been widely used with benefit to many women. Complications arise in a small proportion, occurring acutely in the perioperative stage, post-operatively and in a delayed fashion many years after implantation. Clinical trials provide data on selected patients who are as homogeneous as possible. Real world studies rarely provide detail on the denominator population from which the sample originates. Mature clinical quality registries (CQR) provide long term data on a non selected population who have undergone a procedure for a given condition. Near complete case ascertainment is the goal and there are many examples in other clinical areas. Due to the serious and potentially life changing nature of some of the complications that may arise following SMUS, health agencies instigated action on behalf of patients to promote improvements in care. The International Continence Society (ICS) assembled a multidisciplinary working group to forge this guidance. The working group includes 2 consumer advocates and relevant medical expertise. The management of complications following SMUS placement is discussed and algorithms are provided for each of the common complications of SMUS. The recommendations are based on an expert consensus derived from experience and limited data from a multiple narrative and systematic reviews of the literature. Due to a retrospective design, low cohort numbers, short follow-up and inconsistent definitions, all the studies were at high risk of bias (Figure 1). This overview of SMUS complications commissioned by the ICS aims to provide background literature and algorithms for management of common problems that may present, though it is not exhaustive. Problems such as recurrent urine infection and overactive bladder may have their root cause in an obstructive SMUS. The temporal link between sling implantation and onset of symptoms is not always evident and patients are not always aware that an SMUS was implanted as part of a pelvic floor procedure. Clinicians need to be assiduous in their history taking and physical examination to determine the likely root cause using imaging or other tests judiciously. Multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) are required particularly where chronic pain has developed

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Continence
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cont.2025.101760
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnosis and treatment of synthetic mid-urethral sling complications

Éric Bautrant, Chris Harding, Helen E. O’Connell, Sherif Mourad et al.
Continence
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Diagnosis and treatment of synthetic mid-urethral sling complications

Éric Bautrant, Chris Harding, Helen E. O’Connell, Sherif Mourad, Venetia Hoe, Henry H. Yao, Gaurav Khatri, Phyllis Glanc, Sarah Love‐Jones, Karen Ward, Nicolle Germano, Charlotte Korte, Hashim Hashim, Sanjeevan Vasudevan Kalavampara
article en

Abstract

Synthetic Mid-Urethral Slings (SMUS) have been widely used with benefit to many women. Complications arise in a small proportion, occurring acutely in the perioperative stage, post-operatively and in a delayed fashion many years after implantation. Clinical trials provide data on selected patients who are as homogeneous as possible. Real world studies rarely provide detail on the denominator population from which the sample originates. Mature clinical quality registries (CQR) provide long term data on a non selected population who have undergone a procedure for a given condition. Near complete case ascertainment is the goal and there are many examples in other clinical areas. Due to the serious and potentially life changing nature of some of the complications that may arise following SMUS, health agencies instigated action on behalf of patients to promote improvements in care. The International Continence Society (ICS) assembled a multidisciplinary working group to forge this guidance. The working group includes 2 consumer advocates and relevant medical expertise. The management of complications following SMUS placement is discussed and algorithms are provided for each of the common complications of SMUS. The recommendations are based on an expert consensus derived from experience and limited data from a multiple narrative and systematic reviews of the literature. Due to a retrospective design, low cohort numbers, short follow-up and inconsistent definitions, all the studies were at high risk of bias (Figure 1). This overview of SMUS complications commissioned by the ICS aims to provide background literature and algorithms for management of common problems that may present, though it is not exhaustive. Problems such as recurrent urine infection and overactive bladder may have their root cause in an obstructive SMUS. The temporal link between sling implantation and onset of symptoms is not always evident and patients are not always aware that an SMUS was implanted as part of a pelvic floor procedure. Clinicians need to be assiduous in their history taking and physical examination to determine the likely root cause using imaging or other tests judiciously. Multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) are required particularly where chronic pain has developed

ContinenceVol. 14
Ain Shams University (EG), Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre (IN), Queensland Police Service (AU), North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), The University of Melbourne (AU), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Southmead Hospital (GB), School Based Health Alliance (US), At Bristol (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Eastern Health (AU), St Mary's Hospital (GB), Hôpital Sainte-Périne (FR), Monash University (AU), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.