Microfiltration of microalgae biomolecules: Impact of pulsed electric fields and high-pressure homogenization on single-cell protein recovery and membrane fouling

This study investigated the separation of single-cell proteins from disrupted Auxenochlorella protothecoides microalgae using microfiltration. The microalgae were heterotrophically cultivated and subjected to two cell disruption methods, high-pressure homogenization (HPH) and pulsed electric field with incubation (PEF + inc), and stored at −20 °C. The impact of HPH and PEF + inc on the microfiltration performance of thawed samples was assessed. HPH treatment resulted in complete cell lysis, releasing a heterogeneous mixture of intracellular compounds. This, potentially combined with freezing effects, led to rapid membrane fouling and a 70 % decline in the permeate flux, finally stabilizing at 15 L m −2 h −1 . In contrast, PEF + inc preserved cell integrity and particle size even after freezing, liberating mainly soluble compounds. This resulted in a more porous cake layer and a limited decline in the permeate flux, which stabilized at 24 L m −2 h −1 . Additionally, higher protein transmission rates were achieved with PEF + inc (141.75 g m −2 h −1 ) than with HPH (54.53 g m −2 h −1 ) and it was 5.6 times more energy efficient. The cake layer formed by the HPH-treated samples had a higher resistance owing to smaller apparent pores and increased interaction with permeating proteins, which hindered protein transmission. These findings demonstrate that cell disruption methods can significantly influence downstream protein recovery efficiency and energy consumption. PEF + inc shows great potential as an energy-efficient bioprocessing method for microalgae biorefineries. • HPH disintegrated microalgae cells, while PEF + inc preserved cell morphology. • Unlike PEF + inc, HPH-treatment forms denser cake layer with lower permeate flux. • The porosity of the cake layer determined the protein transmission and yield. • PEF + inc was more energy-efficient than HPH for disruption-separation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Algal Research
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2025.104015
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microfiltration of microalgae biomolecules: Impact of pulsed electric fields and high-pressure homogenization on single-cell protein recovery and membrane fouling

Iris Haberkorn, Peter Desmond, Alexander Mathys, Joseph Dumpler et al.
3 citations
Algal Research
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
2.19
article

Microfiltration of microalgae biomolecules: Impact of pulsed electric fields and high-pressure homogenization on single-cell protein recovery and membrane fouling

Iris Haberkorn, Peter Desmond, Alexander Mathys, Joseph Dumpler, Zhao Li, Byron Perez
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the separation of single-cell proteins from disrupted Auxenochlorella protothecoides microalgae using microfiltration. The microalgae were heterotrophically cultivated and subjected to two cell disruption methods, high-pressure homogenization (HPH) and pulsed electric field with incubation (PEF + inc), and stored at −20 °C. The impact of HPH and PEF + inc on the microfiltration performance of thawed samples was assessed. HPH treatment resulted in complete cell lysis, releasing a heterogeneous mixture of intracellular compounds. This, potentially combined with freezing effects, led to rapid membrane fouling and a 70 % decline in the permeate flux, finally stabilizing at 15 L m −2 h −1 . In contrast, PEF + inc preserved cell integrity and particle size even after freezing, liberating mainly soluble compounds. This resulted in a more porous cake layer and a limited decline in the permeate flux, which stabilized at 24 L m −2 h −1 . Additionally, higher protein transmission rates were achieved with PEF + inc (141.75 g m −2 h −1 ) than with HPH (54.53 g m −2 h −1 ) and it was 5.6 times more energy efficient. The cake layer formed by the HPH-treated samples had a higher resistance owing to smaller apparent pores and increased interaction with permeating proteins, which hindered protein transmission. These findings demonstrate that cell disruption methods can significantly influence downstream protein recovery efficiency and energy consumption. PEF + inc shows great potential as an energy-efficient bioprocessing method for microalgae biorefineries. • HPH disintegrated microalgae cells, while PEF + inc preserved cell morphology. • Unlike PEF + inc, HPH-treatment forms denser cake layer with lower permeate flux. • The porosity of the cake layer determined the protein transmission and yield. • PEF + inc was more energy-efficient than HPH for disruption-separation.

Algal ResearchVol. 88
ETH Zurich (CH), The Cambridge Centre for Advanced Research and Education in Singapore (SG), Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), CREATe Centre (GB), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.