Comparison of the effects of features and classifiers on performance in the cardiovascular disease detection system

This study aims to analyze the effects of features and classifiers in detecting cardiovascular diseases (CVD), which remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early and accurate detection of CVD significantly affects treatment outcomes. Therefore, the proposed method aims to automatically detect cardiovascular diseases via artificial intelligence. In this research, the performances of artificial intelligence methods for the cardiovascular disease detection problem are analyzed. The dataset used in this study was sourced from the publicly available Kaggle platform. It used for performance analysis in the developed application includes the features of 70000 patients such as age, gender, height, weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, smoking and alcohol use. These features were classified with Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, SVM, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) methods and performance comparison was performed. In the experimental results, the highest accuracy rate of 72.55% was obtained using the Gradient Boosting method, demonstrating its superior performance in cardiovascular disease detection. In addition, it was observed that the classification performance decreased when the high blood pressure attribute was removed from the dataset, while the removal of other features did not significantly affect the performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Reports-A
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59313/jsr-a.1579269
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the effects of features and classifiers on performance in the cardiovascular disease detection system

Yıldız Aydın, İzzet Emir
Journal of Scientific Reports-A
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Comparison of the effects of features and classifiers on performance in the cardiovascular disease detection system

Yıldız Aydın, İzzet Emir
article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effects of features and classifiers in detecting cardiovascular diseases (CVD), which remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early and accurate detection of CVD significantly affects treatment outcomes. Therefore, the proposed method aims to automatically detect cardiovascular diseases via artificial intelligence. In this research, the performances of artificial intelligence methods for the cardiovascular disease detection problem are analyzed. The dataset used in this study was sourced from the publicly available Kaggle platform. It used for performance analysis in the developed application includes the features of 70000 patients such as age, gender, height, weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, smoking and alcohol use. These features were classified with Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, SVM, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) methods and performance comparison was performed. In the experimental results, the highest accuracy rate of 72.55% was obtained using the Gradient Boosting method, demonstrating its superior performance in cardiovascular disease detection. In addition, it was observed that the classification performance decreased when the high blood pressure attribute was removed from the dataset, while the removal of other features did not significantly affect the performance.

Journal of Scientific Reports-A(060)
Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.