CPWS: Confident Programmatic Weak Supervision for High-Quality Data Labeling

Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) is a recent data labeling paradigm, which employs several Labeling Functions (LFs) to provide weak labels and involves a Label Model (LM) for label aggregation. Despite the significant progress, there still remain some inherent challenges in PWS. From the view of labeling, LFs may wrongly label some data points. From the view of data, some data points themselves may be low-quality (e.g., ambiguous texts or blurred images). These largely stem from the lack of an explicit evaluation mechanism for LFs or data points. To this end, inspired by confident learning focusing on label quality, we propose a Confident PWS (CPWS) approach for high-quality data labeling. Specifically, several LFs are firstly utilized to provide weak labels for unlabeled data. Then, we develop an explicit Dual Evaluation Mechanism (DEM) to evaluate the quality of both LFs and data points, which not only employs data to evaluate trained models but also leverages trained models to evaluate data. Along this line, we further design a Distribution-Guided Pruning Strategy (DPS) to prune low-quality data and aggregate weak labels under the guidance of label class distribution. Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization ability of our proposed approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3725730
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CPWS: Confident Programmatic Weak Supervision for High-Quality Data Labeling

Shulan Ruan, Enhong Chen, Caleb Chen Cao, Huijie Liu et al.
4 citations
ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Machine Learning in Healthcare
9.92
article

CPWS: Confident Programmatic Weak Supervision for High-Quality Data Labeling

Shulan Ruan, Enhong Chen, Caleb Chen Cao, Huijie Liu, Lei Chen, Kun Zhang, Bin Feng, Zhao Chen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Programmatic Weak Supervision (PWS) is a recent data labeling paradigm, which employs several Labeling Functions (LFs) to provide weak labels and involves a Label Model (LM) for label aggregation. Despite the significant progress, there still remain some inherent challenges in PWS. From the view of labeling, LFs may wrongly label some data points. From the view of data, some data points themselves may be low-quality (e.g., ambiguous texts or blurred images). These largely stem from the lack of an explicit evaluation mechanism for LFs or data points. To this end, inspired by confident learning focusing on label quality, we propose a Confident PWS (CPWS) approach for high-quality data labeling. Specifically, several LFs are firstly utilized to provide weak labels for unlabeled data. Then, we develop an explicit Dual Evaluation Mechanism (DEM) to evaluate the quality of both LFs and data points, which not only employs data to evaluate trained models but also leverages trained models to evaluate data. Along this line, we further design a Distribution-Guided Pruning Strategy (DPS) to prune low-quality data and aggregate weak labels under the guidance of label class distribution. Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization ability of our proposed approach.

ACM Transactions on Information SystemsVol. 43(4)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Hefei University of Technology (CN), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University Town of Shenzhen (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.