Clinical outcomes of one-stent crossover approach for left main bifurcation in a single center

Aim: For the majority of left main coronary artery (LM) bifurcation lesions treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, one-stent crossover technique and provisional approach to the side branch is recommended, which is simpler compared to complex two-stent techniques. In this study, we aimed to reveal the clinical outcomes of one-stent crossover approach for LM bifurcation. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent one-stent crossover technique for unprotected LM bifurcation lesion between May 2020 and November 2023 in our center were included in this retrospective observational study. Clinical and procedural characteristics of the patients were recorded. All patients or their relatives were called to inquire about clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was determined as target lesion failure (TLF), which was defined as clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion-related myocardial infarction (TL-MI), or sudden cardiac death (SCD). Results: A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Crossover stenting was performed from the LM to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 76 patients and from the LM to the left circumflex artery (LCX) in 8 patients. The median follow-up time was 22 (3-54) months. Clinically driven TLR occurred in 2 patients, TL-MI in 1 patient, and SCD in 1 patient. TLF criteria were met in only 3 patients. Of these patients, 2 had undergone LM-LAD and 1 had undergone LM-LCX crossover stenting. Conclusion: One-stent crossover approach for LM bifurcation lesions is associated with very good clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18663/tjcl.1599187
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of one-stent crossover approach for left main bifurcation in a single center

Ufuk Yıldırım, Alperen Altınbaş
Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Clinical outcomes of one-stent crossover approach for left main bifurcation in a single center

Ufuk Yıldırım, Alperen Altınbaş
article en

Abstract

Aim: For the majority of left main coronary artery (LM) bifurcation lesions treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, one-stent crossover technique and provisional approach to the side branch is recommended, which is simpler compared to complex two-stent techniques. In this study, we aimed to reveal the clinical outcomes of one-stent crossover approach for LM bifurcation. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent one-stent crossover technique for unprotected LM bifurcation lesion between May 2020 and November 2023 in our center were included in this retrospective observational study. Clinical and procedural characteristics of the patients were recorded. All patients or their relatives were called to inquire about clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was determined as target lesion failure (TLF), which was defined as clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), target lesion-related myocardial infarction (TL-MI), or sudden cardiac death (SCD). Results: A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Crossover stenting was performed from the LM to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 76 patients and from the LM to the left circumflex artery (LCX) in 8 patients. The median follow-up time was 22 (3-54) months. Clinically driven TLR occurred in 2 patients, TL-MI in 1 patient, and SCD in 1 patient. TLF criteria were met in only 3 patients. Of these patients, 2 had undergone LM-LAD and 1 had undergone LM-LCX crossover stenting. Conclusion: One-stent crossover approach for LM bifurcation lesions is associated with very good clinical outcomes.

Turkish Journal of Clinics and LaboratoryVol. 16(1)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.